The only one that seemed to explain the discrepancy to me was E but I was a little hung up on the fact that it said "detect" tornadoes, because I thought detecting would be different from actually recording them.

I associated the idea of tornadoes "recorded" with tornadoes that have already happened. Whether more people are helping detect them or not, aren't they going to happen anyway and will therefore give them a tornado to record? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what E is actually saying. Is it that they are helping authorities detect tornadoes that already happened or is it that they are helping authorities "spot" tornadoes that are going to happen later on? Would it have made a difference if E said "detect future tornadoes"?

Only took me 10 business days to answer the question but a win is a win

The first time around, I completely disregarded the concept of "households" after reading the stimulus and started overanalyzing D so much that it started to sound irrelevant. Kind of scary how glossing over one word can change everything!

I’m interested!

Don't be discouraged!! I think of each question, whether wrong or right, as a learning opportunity. You are not expected to be perfect this early on. I believe in you!

I got the question right but in a somewhat different and more time consuming way. I ended up with the statement participants→ certificates and the statement participants ←s→ active but failed to realize that I could form a chain, which also made it more difficult for me to see the relationship between certificate and active right away. For answer choice B, I figured that since active←s→participants, then we could also say that certificates ←s→ active because certificates is a necessary condition of participants. If some of those who received community recognition certificates are not active, we can infer that not all of those who received community recognition certificates are active.

#feedback Some of the videos allow you to switch to full screen, fast forward, change the speed, etc. while other videos do not. I tried refreshing the page but that only worked once. Can this issue be resolved?

For question #5, I'm still not understanding how we are able to assume that "the rights of any presently living individual" refers to the right of any presently living individual to destroy a piece of artistic heritage. How do we assume these are the "rights" they're talking about?

Same! I was not really understanding how this statement was saying that humans act SELFISHLY more often than they act unselfishly, as it started off by saying that there is no statistical evidence of this. It helped to separate the comparative statement and focusing on that first.

For question #4 I think I may have been focused on trying to figure out the strength of the argument instead of whether or not it was an argument. My thinking was that if they were able to almost afford a mortgage for an amount 2x their salary, wouldn't it depend on what the rate increase is? What if the rate increase is not substantial enough to put mortgages beyond their reach? Couldn't they possibly still afford it if the rate increase is not substantial? If they were almost able to afford a mortgage for an amount 2x their salary, it must mean that they had some wiggle room. Maybe I'm overthinking it...