#help I chose answer option E, which J.Y. said was essentially the right idea but applied to the wrong kind of question. Could someone clarify why E doesn’t work here and what type of question it would be correct for? I want to better understand where I went wrong. Thanks!

Initally, I chose C because the stem already discussed the cost comparison so I thought it would somehow be irrelevant if already addressed but in hindsight, I understand how it would be far more useful in evaluating the arg. versus answer choice B.

#feedback #help: Is anyone else facing difficulties when pausing the video to have a moment to think/write notes? The text disappears with a blank white page until you unpause, which gets a bit frustrating.

i think i get too overconfident when it comes to understanding the stim, that i start skimming and miss key words like "vitamin content", I chose C solely because I thought the stim does not discuss vitamin content, when it does... gotta work on this ripppp

I had D selected for so long, until prior to submission I reread B, and it made sense that if both forms are present in lab studies using perfectly balanced soil which breaks down both molecule types equally, then the results would be misleading. Especially since the chemist makes the argument that the breakdown of both forms varies greatly on the local soil type, it is never perfectly balanced and distributed as a controlled lab study.

picking the wrong answer and realizing after it was because you missed ONE word in the correct answer is a different kind of pain rippp for some reason, I thought E was saying "more likely" and not "less likely" which is why I chose A...

ugh i am not sure why but i chose D last minute since I was second-guessing. The accuracy of the psychatrists tools doesn't seem as relevant to strengthening the argument as C does initally. #help ?

I understand why A is the correct answer choice, but I’m confused by the explanation for why C is wrong. The question stem says “which of the following, if true,” so shouldn’t it be fair game for an answer choice to introduce new facts that challenge the argument, even if the argument claims the plants were “unique”? J.Y. said the passage already anticipates this, but doesn’t that just emphasize an assumption that C could be testing? #help