A feature to toggle on/off whether or not you see the counts of how many other people have applied/gotten in/gotten rejected.
I don't use it, but it would be cool if we can change expected accuracy. One thing I'd LOVE for analytics is the ability to only look at a few PTs. For example, in my first two PT (diagnostic and one after Core Curriculum), I was terrible at finding the MC so missed all of these. Now I get them right, but it still says highest priority. It would be helpful to know what is high priority as you progress, like highest priority from my last 3 PTs so I can really find my current weaknesses
Obviously when you get near to the test, you're also a little burnt out. I like the idea of tapering (taken from sports) as I scored my highest PT after going easier the week before. I tried to recreate this for another PT to test it out and my score decreased a little (granted I was also quite exhausted on that PT day).
Wondering if there are any taper recommendations so you feel prepped but fresh for actual test. Thanks!
Same thing about highlighting the whole paragraph instead of just a word
These purpose questions remind anyone of high school lit classes? "Why did the author make the guy's hat blue?" - My response: "idk because the author likes blue." Teacher: "No, it's to show his allegiance change from the republic to the revolutionists"....
#feedback would be cool if, in the future, analytics can see your diagnostic or PTs and recommend a Split Approach if you tend to get the passages mixed up
Does anybody remember which part of the Core Curriculum (I think it was Foundations) went over identifying the Necessary and Sufficient conditions when there were no indicator words? I feel like there was a Skill Builder, but I could be wrong. Want to review.
The answer says "..is motivated solely by the desire to hurt that competitor" and the stimulus says "motive in refusing to accept the coupons was simply to hurt Marty's Pizza" It sounds like in the first one, the only motivation is to hurt the competitor, but it feels like the second one doesn't necessarily preclude other motives.
Does simply mean/imply solely?
Is solely a stronger version, but it still activates that the motive was simply to do something?
OR Does the solely/simply connection not matter?
How can we access the old 7sage site once the new one moves to 7sage.com? It still has my data on my diagnostic test, and I like the diagram showing the percentage of the way you are through each of the sections (Foundations, LR, RC). It was keeping me on track with my studying. I'm using features of both at the moment
Hi! If a sufficient condition can point to two necessary conditions, you can say there is a "some" relationship between those two necessary conditions. So if X -> Y and X-> Z, you can say that some Y are Z and some Z are Y. This also works further out in the chain.
Here you have clerks -> talk and you have baseball moms -> soccer moms -> talk. If you take the contrapositive, /talk -> /clerk and /talk -> /soccer mom -> /baseball mom, you can create "some" conclusions between /clerk and /soccer mom and between /clerk and /baseball mom.
Thinking through.. if I'm rejected to a school that I was really hoping to get into, it would be a bit of a bummer to see how many people got accepted. It may be helpful to see that others got rejected with you, but it would be nice to have the "turn off" option. I know what's helped me with the stress is to be "head down, blinders on, do what I can do, don't compare to others"