i feel like the best one to start with to get a feel is the sequential approach, no? Just to see if I get the main points jumbled up in my head and such...
#feedback would be cool if, in the future, analytics can see your diagnostic or PTs and recommend a Split Approach if you tend to get the passages mixed up
Okay, I'm glad I haven't touched any PTs up until this point (aside from diagnostic). Plenty of room to experiment. I think I'm usually pretty good at discerning the keen and subtle differences between two different authors (or two different comparative passages).
#feedback - under "Summary" where it says "Standard Approach", is this referring to the approach we use during other RC passages? This seems to be referred to elsewhere as the
"Reading Method". Should this say "Sequential Approach" instead or am I misunderstanding? Thanks for taking a look at this for clarity.
8 comments
Good luck
ik im not going to do well with this approach so I will not read
@nelleluvsyou lmao
i feel like the best one to start with to get a feel is the sequential approach, no? Just to see if I get the main points jumbled up in my head and such...
#feedback would be cool if, in the future, analytics can see your diagnostic or PTs and recommend a Split Approach if you tend to get the passages mixed up
These two approaches are almost written like a pair of comparative passages LOL ironic
Okay, I'm glad I haven't touched any PTs up until this point (aside from diagnostic). Plenty of room to experiment. I think I'm usually pretty good at discerning the keen and subtle differences between two different authors (or two different comparative passages).
#feedback - under "Summary" where it says "Standard Approach", is this referring to the approach we use during other RC passages? This seems to be referred to elsewhere as the
"Reading Method". Should this say "Sequential Approach" instead or am I misunderstanding? Thanks for taking a look at this for clarity.