#feedback would be cool if, in the future, analytics can see your diagnostic or PTs and recommend a Split Approach if you tend to get the passages mixed up
Okay, I'm glad I haven't touched any PTs up until this point (aside from diagnostic). Plenty of room to experiment. I think I'm usually pretty good at discerning the keen and subtle differences between two different authors (or two different comparative passages).
i feel like the best one to start with to get a feel is the sequential approach, no? Just to see if I get the main points jumbled up in my head and such...
#feedback - under "Summary" where it says "Standard Approach", is this referring to the approach we use during other RC passages? This seems to be referred to elsewhere as the
"Reading Method". Should this say "Sequential Approach" instead or am I misunderstanding? Thanks for taking a look at this for clarity.
8 comments
These two approaches are almost written like a pair of comparative passages LOL ironic
#feedback would be cool if, in the future, analytics can see your diagnostic or PTs and recommend a Split Approach if you tend to get the passages mixed up
Okay, I'm glad I haven't touched any PTs up until this point (aside from diagnostic). Plenty of room to experiment. I think I'm usually pretty good at discerning the keen and subtle differences between two different authors (or two different comparative passages).
ik im not going to do well with this approach so I will not read
@nelleluvsyou lmao
Good luck
i feel like the best one to start with to get a feel is the sequential approach, no? Just to see if I get the main points jumbled up in my head and such...
#feedback - under "Summary" where it says "Standard Approach", is this referring to the approach we use during other RC passages? This seems to be referred to elsewhere as the
"Reading Method". Should this say "Sequential Approach" instead or am I misunderstanding? Thanks for taking a look at this for clarity.