I'm starting my PT & BR process now and need someone to BR with specifically for LR. I want someone who is dedicated and will actually show up and be consistent. I am scoring in the low 150's as of now. If you're interested, please message me and we can get started soon as possible.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
@ Still such an amazing score! What prep materail did you use especially for logic games?
One thing that helped me with this question is to chain it like J.Y did in the video (SCQ --> 6 --> 7 --> ACQ) and write down the contrapositive statement of that as well, so (ACQ --> 7 --> 6 --> SCQ). After that just run down the AC choices and you realize that logically only 'E' works :)
@ I'm done University and I work maybe two times a week. Which leads me to spend over 30 hours or more just studying for this exam. So personally for me, I think studying for a year would be mentally draining. Also I'm in Canada, we are big on rolling admissions, I want to write the LSAT March 2020, get results late April, if not good, re-write for July. Finish personal statements in August & get ready to submit all applications in September 2020 which is why I do not prefer writting in Fall. I don't have an excuse as to why I should not be prepared with 5 months of priority LSAT studying! It'll be hardwork but March 2020, I will get over a 160 :)
@ if you don't mind, what resources did you use in terms of prep material? Thank you!
I don't know how to feel but I'm not too discouraged because I know I put in about 50% effort in finishing this diagnostic (HORRIBLE migrane during it, I just wanted to finish the test) . But I'm looking to increase by 20 points & I bought the Ultimate + in hopes of achieving that. Dedicating about 4 days out of the week till March 2020 prepping for this LSAT. Any of you have similar stats and ended up improving? or do I need to get realistic? Please help!
Possible to get into 160s by March 2020?
Logic Games Question - What prep tests do you think are essential for foolproofing? Some say 1-35 and others have a different range, like yours. I will be foolproofing soon and would love some guidance!
I'm confused as to why we ruled out spent fuel rods on the basis that they never contain "significant" quantities of tellurium isotopes? In the first sentence of the stimulus, it just states that they found "radioactive isotopes of iodine, tellurium, and cesium" which doesn't mention the quantity so I'm confused as to why J.Y rules out fuel rods for that reason? There could be SOME tellurium, just not significant amount.
The problem I had with this question was that you had to assume that they found "significant" quantities of tellurium. I was thinking okay even if they don't have significant quantities, we don't know theexact quantity of the isotopes so can't rule out spent fuel rods on that basis and J.Y. and a lot of other people ruled it out on that note so :/
I wasn't fully understanding J.Y's explanation so I tried powerscores, it made more sense to me. So basically the argument is saying if we make the tenants pay, they'll be more conscious of how much electricity they use and will conserve less energy (assuming cost is enough of an incentive to deter). The right answer states that if the landlords have this strong incentive to be energy efficient and we take it away from them, then the tenants will be left to take care of that. What if the tenants simply don't care about paying more or being energy efficient? We would have to ASSUME they want to pay less and use energy efficiently which is a red flag on its own. So although my initial assumption didn't play a direct role in the AC, it was definitely a factor!
Fell for AC B as well. AC B is saying driving conditions are the same but columnist is assuming his driving conditions are "normal" as the manufactures mention. Basically same driving conditions do not equal normal driving conditions.
Okay guys we have ten people available! Please message me your names and I can try to figure out a platform for all of us to connect!
@ @ Sounds good guys! I'll leave this up a day or two and see if we have anyone else who is interested!
--
I'm also writting in March 2020, but from October till last week of December, I've been focusing on building my foundation for all three areas. I would highly advise you don't burn through practice tests since they are one of the most effective ways to improve your scores. Hence, do practice tests once you have the foundations down, and after every single practice test blindreview and see exactly what type of questions your missing, why your answer is wrong, etc... I start practice testing starting January and I don't plan on doing more then two a week since reviewing the PT is crucial! There is a ton of blind review sessions held and you can join to see how your thinking varies from others. I hope this helps! My goal score is also 163ish and we will pull it off! Hard work and perserverance.
74 - 88 (Most recent)?
OR
Others you think are quite valuable? Mixture of any between 1 - 88?
--
If you know a tutor or have any study approaches that helped you please let me know especially if you started low as -13. Any guidance would be helpful. I've tried 7sage, PS, & trainer. I try reading for structure and review all RC passages through 7sage. Somedays I'm at 20/27 (twice) timed and most other days I'm at an average of -13. I think the days where I hit 21 or 20 are merely flukes. Untimed I'm typically 23-24.
Thank you.
Did your proctor have to put in the password each time a new section started? I took the flex today, I have accommodations but I'm not sure if this was normal or not. I don't want to freak out so if this also happened to you, please share!
Main note: B is wrong because even if negated, it doesn't ruin the argument. Let's say the people in the aerobics classes also attended weight training classes. So? argument could still hold up that aerobic exercise helps the body with stress. Whereas if you negate E, it ends up saying that the people who were in the aerobic classes did not get enough aerobic exercise and that link is broken ruining the argument. Then shouldn't the weight lifting volunteers be able to handle stress?
The first chapter of 7Sage is 'The LSAT is Hard' When you have that little voice in your head that doubts you.. this is so encouraging! We give our power away so easily.
Thank you so much!
I sketched out the diagram and it made the conclusion valid.. then I noted that this is a parallel flaw so something was off LOL. Should have tried the other way before committing to answering, B was so easy to spot given the right diagram.
Is there anywhere where I can find definitions or descriptions of these grouping game categories? These four are categorized by 7sage but I've gone through the CC & I can't find any description.
Grouping pure:
Grouping sequence:
Grouping repeating:
Grouping - Interchangeable:
Example for grouping repeating games: I know that I will have to group items and those items are repeating. Hence, using a chart will be most helpful.
Experience instruction many times =/= repeating instruction many times.