Hi! That's me! I'd love to study together :)
I’m worried about taking the LSAT on the computer when I work much better when I am able to get write notes next to the passage in the margin. How have people worked around this? P.S. I won’t be able to get a paper accommodation.
I’m wondering if anyone else finds the estimated times for the lessons are way lower than the time they are spending? There are some lessons (most lessons) that say they should take 2-4 minutes to read and I spend easily 10 minutes reading them. I’m not worried about it because I think the time I’m taking to really understand the concepts and take notes will help me in the long run. That being said everything is taking me a LOT longer so my studying process will be longer.
Do other people have this experience? Advice? Comments?
Jacob, I was wondering the same thing so you’re question and Matt’s answer is very helpful. I’m wondering what your study schedule is like since your goal test is quite a ways out. I’m trying to determine for myself if my test date is too ambitious. Thanks!
#help Just a hypothetical here:
Since "all" also implies "some" can we translate line 1 to be A ←s→ B?
And "most" also implies "some" so can we translate line 2 to A ←s→ C?
#help Is there another way to write the Lawgic for the "Some" negation?
These are the 2 English negations for "some":
1. No Jedi are weak.
2. All Jedi are not weak.
I understand the Lawgic listed: J -> /w
Shouldn't you be able to represent 1. as /J -> w ?
I understand that these are not equivalent and maybe I'm confused about necesary/sufficient but I feel like it is correctly translating 1.
#help
How would use use Lawgic for this sentence: "Only amphitheaters without water fountains are Roman."?
"Only" is used as a Necessary indicator and "without" is used as a Negate Sufficient indicator.
Wouldn't it be /water fountains -> Roman Amphitheater?
(amphitheaters directly follows "only" so I made it the necessary conditional)
But that is the opposite of the answer for 4.1 even though the sentence I pulled is listed as a Logically Identical Variant
It would be very helpful (especially for the long pages) if there was a previous and next button on the top. Thanks! #feedback
Why is milk the object. More accurately, why is the predicate object important? Isn't "The cat likes to drink" sufficient and then (fermented) milk is the modifier? #help
Similar to Tiger: All parts of fruits are not healthy. The core of an apple has cyanide which is poisonous.
Similar to Disney: All doctors went to medical school. Everyone at this conference is a doctor. All the doctors at this conference who went to medical school went to either Johns Hopkins or Tulane. Dr. Smith did not go to Tulane so he went to Johns Hopkins.
Similar to Cat: My boat is on the other side of the harbor than it was when I parked it. My neighbor likes to look at my boat, and does so with envy. He is looking at my boat now and smiling. I think my neighbor stole my boat.
Let me know if you think these are similar argument styles!
I think the videos from V1 should be included in V2 where possible... #feedback
the tiger illustration is a proving a generalization false (that all mammals can make good pets) by showing 1 exclusion - now we know that not ALL mammals make good pets. The disney argument is using conditional statements to lead to a statment that must be true #thoughts?
I'm a video kind of person but also want the most updated version of the information, what should I do? Continue with V1 or V2? Both? #help
I'm in Chicago-ish and am planning to take the LSAT around then! I'd love to be accountability buddies