Thank you 7sage!! This platform meant so much throughout my exam preparation. It's the only service I used and found it so incredibly helpful.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I had the exact same question. I think it is. Just because a subset of actions (alturistic) can be described by self-interest does not mean the whole set (all actions) can.
I had a similar question. Although I chose C I felt as if "it will lead to unhappiness" is too strong. If you think about it, the bill (like any other bill) is eventually aimed at increasing happiness although it creates some unhappiness in the meantime. I felt as if answer C should have used a milder statement like "create some unhappiness". However, it's still the best choice out of all of them.
#help My issue with answer choice D is that it makes it seem as if the sentence containing "probably" and the one containing "definitely" function as the same conclusion. That's what made me skeptical of the answer and made me switch it to A. Am I wrong? Is it the same conclusion?
I also think it's more suitable for a SA question because we are asked to look for X→Y
#help I am confused about how to interpret the word "probably" I was hesitant to draw necessary and sufficient relationships for ideas introduced by probably "if x then probably y" The video explanation seems to consider it x -> y
I was thinking of starting doing them as soon as I start the core curriculum on 7sage. However, I heard that it's usually recommended to alter the type of drills you're doing. For example, combining RC with LR, etc. Since the 7sage core curriculum is organized by the three sections, doing drills in parallel would mean separating the RC drills from LR and LG.
I'm interested to hear your thoughts on best strategy :)
Interested!