All good, we can work together to make it better!

I'm also wondering the same thing about paper. If my experimental section is another set of LG, Ima need hella paper lol

If anyone is still confused basically the argument is a SOME NOT(refuse to support publicly = not support publicly) & D is saying Not all(some do not) support publicly. So its just the same sentence but the not all carries the negation

not 100% sure, but I've done some later 20s early 30s and alot of those are similar in terms of sequencing in out games and some grouping. feel like its almost better to do later games and then go back to the misc games in 1-16 just in case the test throws you a curve ball

My average is 164, I could def be interested because I feel SO close to breaking into 170. Im missing like stupid ones and getting the difficult ones correct lol

4

It's been a while since I took this PT, and I didn't understand the question even after having reviewed it a few times, but I think I have it after really breaking down the conclusion and premise.

I think it's best to start with the conclusion and then work your way backward.

All consuming hobby not succesful strat for overcoming loneliness ect

BECAUSE

X

So, I think the important thing to put together, is why is the conclusion so focused on all-consuming hobbies not being successful strategies? Well because it runs the risk of increasing loneliness. That is the key bridge that B is hitting on. We don't want to run the potential risk of increasing loneliness and you don't want to focus on the friend's bit.

I eliminated everything but D) pretty quickly but here's why it is wrong. "something generally more successful" what do we define as more successful from a not successful strategy? If not success to success is 0-100 is more successful a 20?

Key mistake I made when I took the PT: my immediate thought after reading the Q was, oh they will eventually lose their interest in the hobby, but that doesn't have to be the assumption at all. The assumption is sort of about risk management. If you want to overcome adolescent loneliness, you pick a strategy that doesn't have a risk of increasing loneliness.

I also decided to defer another year.

I was laid off earlier in 2020, I spent some time working with my families business, engaged in other activities, and later that year is when I decided law was the correct path for me. I tried to get to a score of 170 in an unreasonable amount of time.

On top of my parents getting COVID, it was my hubris that made me think I could get that kind of score in the amount of time I was working with.

Now, I'm back to studying, but I'm also volunteering, bolstering my resume, and trying my hardest to get back into a job that hopefully will also help with my applications. I feel much better. It's more strategic in my situation to take more time.

I also want to say for the people that were hoping to go to law school directly after graduating college and feeling like their life is over because of a bad score. I'm closing in on 30. You still got a whole life ahead of you and there's nothing wrong with taking a year to get some professional experience, Americorps, or whatever organization.

I read this muchhhhh differently than the explanation. I read the conclusion as "dev. is not adversely affecting wildlife existing in the park" meaning, the development isn't causing any negative repercussions to the wildlife existing in the park.

C) talks about animals not in the park, these are animals coming from outside the park.

A) no migration mentioned, so try to get that out of your head. Bolsters the survey that quantity of animals IN THE PARK increased.

Does this make sense or am I reading this in a very wrong direction?

#help

Hey Monkey,

I have a similar challenge that I am working on(160 avg 170+ BR). Maybe we should collab and have a short discussion about the source of the challenges are and we may be able to resolution solve together?

Send me a PM if interested.

I'm just not quite seeing the answer for 21)

E) complexity - very clearly mentioned in PA line 1,

Passage B is not so straightforward. I see two possible trains of thought.

1. elaborate > build-up of emotions leads to resolution of emotions, which can lead to "relaxation." That's in paragraph 1

2. In the last paragraph, it directly references complexity. "A trained listener will have a greater preference (for certain preferable emotions), for complex melodies...

So, I'm not quite seeing the positive emotional part of it? #help

Anyone perchance knows or have run into problems similar to this one as JY mentioned? I got this one right, but was close to picking E).

#help (Added by Admin)

I'm going to get above 165 on the October 2021 LSAT!

Would C) work as a sufficient answer choice? #help

thanks all

Hey, does anyone know how to make your ProctorU stop "bouncing"on Macbook whenever a proctor swaps with another Proctor? It is very distracting

Does anyone know how to make the pop ups stop on Macbook whenever your proctor switches with another proctor? It is distracting to see the chat app bouncing up and down during your test

I am struggling with my personal statement. Would love for some people to read it over. Please add me!

gotta avoid D) by not zoning in too much of the concl but the support\

A) Everyone complains about their legislator, their complaints only come from the fact that the legislator has to compromise.

if D) was right: "No matter what I do or what type of positive compromise I make, my constituents always hate me."

I have the same exact problem. When I retake LG's I get anywhere from -0 to -2, but when I take the test I'll get like -4 to -8. Like my score would be probably 166-168ish if I could just do well on the actual test.

I'm def interested

When you have a hypothesis-type question, the hypothesis is the concl usually right?

#help

Would A) be a NA?

#help

One thing I'm not understanding about this AC

Dad chimp receives affection from son chimp, never displays affection back, but dad chimp willing to defend son chimp

Dad chimp gives affection to mom chimp(= to human role), also willing to defend mom chimp.

Why do they sometimes have to reciprocate?

#help

Im happy to help