I Did all the passages in RC. Does anyone have the same issue? How should I study for RC?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Negation of few could mean two things: None or Most Are. Is that the reason why D is incorrect? When it is negated, it could it help the argument even if it can also destroy it? #feedback
The author assumes that subjects make part to whole flaw lol.
"no newspaper adequately covers all sides of every one of its stories." Can someone please explain to me how to correctly translate this part? Does it mean that "some newspapers do not
adequately cover all sides of every one of its stories" or is it " Some stories do not adequately cover all sides"? How to correctly break it down? #help
I eliminated A because I thought that MAYBE there are other ways to get it without the station. Was it wrong ? It’s sounds crazy, but why not ? 😁#help
is it just a bunch of facts or there is some kind of premise->conclusion relationship? I thought that the first part of the last sentence was the conclusion and the second part was the premise. Can anyone help me identify P/C in a more convoluted passage; I mean the ones that do have keywords like "since" but don't have a P-->C relationship and are not arguments itself but a bunch of facts. #help
I eliminated answer choice C because of the "cannot support". We are concerned with development, not support. Correct me if I am wrong. #help
I have a question regarding the argument as a whole. Is there any flaw in the argument?#help
Is there any way to get better with parsing out and understanding abstract language ? #help
nice, sweat dumb kid =)) lmao..I am crying
I had one more reason to discard D.., just because it is "within our ability to solve" doesn't mean that they will be solved. correct me if I am wrong. #help
yea, we don't need a perfect answer. Best out of 5
What is a proper logical negation of Rarely? None or more than rarely? #feedback