For Question #3, can you please define what is sufficient and what is necessary?

is this a logic games question or a logic reasoning question?

I understand that these are skill builders, but should I look at is as just that? Because mentally I need to prepare to do this since we cannot take notes on the test. (from what I have been told, notes are not acceptable) So is this just reprogramming my thinking to best prepare for the test? I am just having a hard time applying these methods so I can score well on the LSAT. How is that possible if these notes cannot be taken?

I cannot stand this section

Are you all memorizing these different types of questions? Or is it moreso important to get down the concepts in order to understand and accurately answer the question?

Will the author 's rhetorical question be evident in the information provided or is that an assumption we have to make?

For question two, would the least expensive option be the correct answer or no? What defines whether or not the answers is the winner? Is it the quality or characteristic being compared? If that's the case, wouldn't something less expensive be the desired choice? Should I not be applying that logic?

For question 2, can you please explain why interglacial is not the winner? the "slowly" part is what confuses me. Do we want the water to change slowly or fast?

Hypothesis or in other words, the conclusion, right?

I know this maybe a stupid question, but isn't Lawgic produced by 7Sagee, not a universal curriculum right?

What if I can figure these answers out without all of the diagramming? Is the diagramming absolutely necessary?