i get it but can someone point me so similar questions? should I drill some Para questions? #help

Thanks for all responses and sorry for the late reply. I was recovering from the Jan LSAT a few days ago. With my timing on LR, I finish with about 8 mins to go back and go over questions I am unsure of. I'm considering The Loophole book as I've heard good things about it.

@jhaldy10325 reading some of your comments on "moving on" quickly when I'm stuck between two answer choices.

I'm going to study lightly for the next few weeks to until I find out my score for my last LSAT. I hope I cracked 170!

10000 different types of beer

JY has explained this question perfectly for me to understand. Are there any other questions with this trick that i can practice with? #help

Very interesting question and answers. I've seen LSAT writers use the same trick as they use here. If you read answer D after reading answer B, it influences you to choose answer D. This is because the LSAT writers are hoping you remember incorrectly answer B as a part of the question.

@8835

I will take the PT while circling the questions I think I've missed. I'll go back and the end and review the question to see if I'll change an answer. After I will review the questions I missed by trying to see if I can get the question correct on a 3rd try. Last, I review all questions to reinforce what I've learned from the PT. I'll focus on the lowest difficulty problem types I missed. For example: If I missed three 3 start PSA questions and everything else I missed were 4 star questions, I'll drill PSA questions.

Why am I getting hung up on A vs. E. Is A solely wrong because many customers wouldn't benefit and it leaves room for many other customers that can benefit? Is it also wrong because it doesn't fail the sufficient in the exception? #help

JY hit this one on the nail for me. I definitely did make that assumption he describes in the variable.

i was very close to picking D but I thought it would require outside knowledge so I got E oof

I got this right because B was the best answer but I actually took a bit of time on this. Chad never explicitly says he thinks there are too many cats. He only says they are a nuisance. I feel like a logical jump like this on a more difficult question could lead me to the wrong answer. Am I missing something here? #help

This was a good question to get wrong for me. After watching JYs video the answer seems pretty straightforward. The causal conclusion the argument expresses is about two completely different items compared to the premise. I need to be more diligent about reading the premises

A) Premise

B) not the conclusion, the author is refuting a particular solution

C) this is a premise to support the conclusion

D) no, the only refuted solution is the colonization of other planets

E) Correct, this is the author’s conclusion

A) Not stated in the stimulus wrong

B) The ethicist believes this but does not encompass the conclusion

C) Same as above, btu is not the conclusion

D) Unstated in stimulus

E) Correct, this is the author’s conclusion

even though I enjoyed the passage, I got -4 on this. :(

Q23 AC is annoying. The word "sanction" has two definitions. It can mean both permissive or restrictive.

here in oakland! would love to study together

P1: NA tribes rec by US ~70s had court drama

P2: ex: Mashpee

Town: no delineated boundaries= not self gov = no territory

Mashpee: But oral culture is diff

P3: US courts begin to ack. the diff. in cult.

#help

I get why E is correct, but I dont get why B is incorrect. Can someone point me in the right direction? why can't increased salaries explain this phenomenon? #help

#help i still really dont see how C is necessary. I dont understand why any NS needs to be near AT LEAST 1 minor fault. I anticipated an answer choice that would say that a NS is near AT MOST 1 minor fault.

Read too fast and got cocky and picked A. Slow and steady wins the race