PB : Poem has whatever meaning is assigned to it by the reader (Whatever, there is no right answer)

AVD -> 2RACI (=/PB, since if two readers agree on the "correct" interpretation, meanings cannot be assigned by the reader)

---------------------

OE -> /PB

Assumption : OE -> AVD

Many parents rigorously organize children's playtime, thinking this will enhance their CD, but this is wrong.

Why?

To structure the playtime and expecting it to make a resourceful and creative child is like expecting a good novel to be made by someone who was told exactly what to do.

Flaw

CD without resourceful and creativeness can be achieved.

the rate of increase has slowed. -> does not necessarily mean it is decreasing.

could be 2010 : 10% / 2011 : 7% / 2012 : 5% ....

Still going up

Ice Age -> Human brain Evolution

Not true because other animals didn't have this evolutionary change.

If fails to address the possibility that a condition can make a change in a species even though there is no change in other species.

HQ -> EE

/EE-> /HQ

------------------------

S -> Author -> /HQ

S->/EE

AC (C) : Author -> /EE

/Ready -> Abandon (= /Abandon -> Ready)

------------------------------------

Teach -> Ready

Teach -> /Abandon

AC (A) : Only those who do not lose motivation (/Abandon) should be introduced to it.(Teach)

9.

The authors would be most likely to

disagree about -> A agree / B disagree

disagree with -> A disagree / B disagree

I thought I accidently pressed RC explanation video..

this is super helpful!

I honestly don't understand why D can't be the right answer choice. To me, B and D look kind of same..?

So the manager did not consider additional causes of the price (expensive), and concluded they need to refurbish... which is B(and also maybe D..?)

Can someone please help me with this?

Thanks!

#help

wow it is so subtle and tricky.. thought C was talking about immoral actions. lesson learned.

Q 17. stem

authors agree with each other ~ => oo / xx

authors agree with ~ => oo

wow

#help

If the lobsters do not live long enough to get the disease, isn't it impossible for humans to get ill as a result of eating it? (Since they cannot live long enough to get the gill disease)

#help

But the previous lessons said that we cannot contradict or attack the premises and conclusions, we should only be attacking the relationships between those premises and conclusion.

How can ACs that attacking the premises be the weakening argument?

art is a passion ≠ art is simply a passion

(art could be = passion + sth else)

- must be assumed -> NA

read the question stem, and do not pick SA answer choice when you have to pick NA answer choice!

risks damaging is not damaging.

risk damaging = could damaging

Maybe she started working in a position that didn't require skill, even though she was a skilled person.

Unskilled is not same as working in a position that requires no special skills.

The stimulus states,

“physics papers reporting results from experiments using subsystems developed at various laboratories generally have authors from each laboratory.”

Answer choice (D) states,

“Physics papers authored by researchers from multiple laboratories usually report results from experiments using subsystems developed at each laboratory.”

#help

I know there are so many comments below explaining why AC E cannot be the one, and i read them thoroughly, but still don't understand why E is incorrect.. also still not sure when to use conditional logic.

Stimulus - rarely cover + secretively -> isolation -> reduce positive response -> discourage

D - /rarely cover -> reduce at least one source of discouragement

E - /discourage -> /isolation =====> seems like a very good reasoning for me?

Could someone please help me with this?

Thank you so much in advance!

#help

some most some

some some some

-> not precisely the same, but since some means 1-100, AC C is correct.

AC B is not the same because studies have shown that not smoking is better than smoking. so it isn't assumed like in the stimulus.