I got this question right but am having trouble to see why there's a biconditional.
I didn't choose A because I remembered the word concede and thought that the word fundamental is too strong if Ginsburg was conceding to something. I was looking for something between A and C. In retrospect, however, I realize that Ginsburg's concession is just that technology can have an effect. It is not so much conceding to any of Weiner's central idea that western technology fundamentally undermines indigenous culture, and the rest of Ginsburg's argument just works on challenging Weiner's claim. I think that's what makes A correct.
On a side note, I thought this was supposed to be a hard passage because how Kevin introduced it, but it's only a 1 star passage?
So I got really stuck on C because I thought there are two NAs for the economy being weak. However, C only mentioned one NA, and I thought that it's just missing another NA, which made me really unsure of what to do with the AC. #help
Uhhh. I assumed that if they were at the station at 9pm, it meant that they were at the station for the whole time, up until 9pm. I also assumed that if they left, they must have left to pursue the prisoner, without thinking about other possibilities.
How do you translate "Only if one is a leader must one convince people of the necessity of their efforts for the attainment of a collective goal" into lawgic? There's "only if" and "must."
It would be really nice if there's a list of the principles that LSAT has tested us on.
What are all the inferences about B and C that you can make from
All As are B
All As are C
From A → B and A → C, we can conclude B ←s→ C
Can we also conclude that all Bs are also Cs?
I am having difficulty translating "No...unless..." statements into lawgic.
I guess I got really confused because when building my lawgic chain, I caught the "fully flooded" part but not the "sink" part, so instead of drawing "sink + fully flooded → implode," I got "fully flooded → implode." So instead of having a conjunction, I just had one SA. When we are making a lawgic chain, how do we know which elements should for sure be included?
As a side note, can A → B and A → C always be rewritten as A → B+C?
Hi everyone, I am wondering if someone has taken the LSAT at the in-person test center in Ottawa. I'd like to do that to avoid potential difficulties with WiFi/proctor because I just get so paranoid thinking about those. But I want to know how that experience has been for those who's done it there? Thank you!
I don't know how I'm just getting these questions right intuitively. When I try to rationalize them they become more confusing.
I was very hesitant to choose A because I thought that the correct AC for MSS is generally not a restatement of one sentence in the stimulus.