The problem I have with flaw questions, is I can see what a problem with the argument is, but it almost never is the answer they have available. So I am left scrambling trying to answer which one is least wrong.

In this one, while doing the problem, I was able to figure out that just because they used two different methods, doesn't mean you should just accept the results. But lo and behold, that is not an answer. So I tried to find one that was least wrong.

not even mad I missed this one to be honest. This is one of the biggest reaches I have seen. The December 2000 PT has had a ton of those. But its a good question to really understand the subtle word play that the LSAC employs time and time again.

I originally read answer choice E as the people who bemoan the anticapitalistic measures were a part of nations with totalitarian regimes. Reading it correctly makes much more sense.

Answer choice A was way more complicated than it needed to be.

I could not for the life of me figure out what this stimulus was saying... Even after watching the video I still don't know how the second sentence has anything to do with the first sentence.

On a lot of these flaw questions, I get the right answer by eliminating the obviously wrong answers, but having no idea how the right answer is right.

Questions from the LSAT in 1999 through 2000 are some of the toughest I have seen.

I keep having this problem where I come across an answer in a flaw question that I have never seen before and it ends up being the correct answer. I don't remember ever seeing C as a choice or correct flaw before this one.

I don't know that I necessarily made that assumption moreso that I didn't catch that the entire argument was talking about hot days, and the conclusion dropped the word "hot". Goes to show that you absolutely must read every single word or(lack thereof) carefully.

Some of these 5 star NA questions have been absolutely brutal.

Wat

That is a wild curve.

This has got to be one of the most ridiculous sufficient necessity flaws I have seen since studying. Wow.

I actually really like these questions, I am just having a hard time getting the speed down.

How they worded C was really confusing in my opinion. Took me awhile in Blind review to get that they were saying Correlation and Causation error.

How they worded B makes it way more confusing than it needs to be.

This answer felt a little too obvious to me. Which is why I was very suspicious of B even though I chose it.

Every other test I will get a one or 2 star question where I do not understand it whatsoever. This was said question. Still don't understand after the video.

I wonder what the reasoning was on why they decided to not de-activate the search feature in the test software. I am not complaining, just curious.

Five star main point RC questions are crazy.

I legitimately think that I have missed every single implied question throughout all the Reading passages I have taken. I am so bad at them.

This argument made me LOL. Wish they were all like this.

I don't think I have ever encountered so many words I have never seen before in two paragraphs. WTF was that. Lol

This one felt a little like an NA question.

I can't believe I read causes as cases in answer choice A. Wow. Also doesn't help that multiple other answer choices have case in them.