Can someone please help me understand how JY translates the final premise using the group 4 indicator "no" and the group 3 indicator "unless"?

I keep seeing conflicting information about how to translate this effectively. Wouldn't the (Group 3) "unless" negate the clause directly after and turn it into the sufficient condition?

Consequently, wouldn't the "no" (Group 4) indicator negate the necessary condition, the final product of this final premise being /explictly request cancellation> subscription will be cancelled?

10/11 ON FIRST RUN 11/11 BR LETS GOOOOO

Raging because I thought the question was about the authors view

19 MINUTES BUT GOT IT WOOOOOH

20 minutes but I diagrammed everything and bulletproofed the argument all on my own

The previous lesson on shallow dip was so good. I'M PRAYING THIS WASN'T A COINCIDENCE.

@Haleh Literally was thinking the same thing and why I couln't solve this first try

Why is it that the moment I read the answer choices I get an inclination to select the right answer, but after trying to reason the answer choice out using JYs methods I second guess myself and choose the wrong choices over and over?

Why do these feel easier than the previous sections strengthen questions?

2/5 and then 5/5 on BR. All of my wrong answers were the result of second guessing myself unfortunately.

Fuck this fucking question man

Finally got one right, and it's a 1* lol.

I spent 10 minutes on this trying to draw out a convoluted conditional statement and still got this wrong. This literally feels hopeless.

@SavanahHoffstein Thanks for the spoilers