This question is a literal nightmare, an hour in and I still can't understand this or diagram it.

wtf is this even bro

A: I chose this because the entire stimulus talks about what the professor felt while doing her study, it also is supported by the conclusion that the students couldn't tell.

B: Wrong because someone might be able to assess her better than herself, what if a sleep specialist watched?

C: We never talked about other jobs

D: The comparison between short and long term here is not discussed or supported

E: What???

A: So what? Anna isn't talking about whether the movies sold royalties are too large, she's talking about the costs of getting the new cassettes in

B: Should? Who even mentioned durability being more important than price?

C: Who cares about what the customer pays? It's about what the store is paying to recoup costs

D: This is correct because she is talking about the costs and benefits of getting the new cassette tapes and basically saying that the store will hardly benefit from the cost saving metrics introduced by bringing in cheaper cassettes

E: Who the hell was talking about rental fees?

I don't understand how C is correct.

Aren't we supposed to take what's in the stimulus as absolutely true for MSS questions? Therefore we have to treat the statement "that the red paint was not mixed in Veronese's workshop. Hence it appears likely that an artist other than Veronese tampered with Veronese's painting after its completion." is one of certainty? It says that it is likely another artist tampered with it, are we supposed to dispute this?

How can it then be that the proposed restoration will fail to restore the painting at the end of Veronese life if a copyist would not have been able to make a major change so quickly after death? Wouldn't this rely on rejecting what the argument is stating and saying "oh actually Veronese did change it, the curator is wrong"? How do I determine when to reject these arguments/premises because I thought I was supposed to take everything within MSS stimuli as WHAT IS TRUE and MUST be abided in the correct answer choice.

If they have uncovered green in the original painting as they are restoring it, why would it be the case that the restoration will fail to have the original appearance it had at the end of Veronese's life (Green)???? Where does it even imply that Veronese would have made this change himself for answer C to be correct???

SKIP

This was a fun question

Can someone please help me understand how JY translates the final premise using the group 4 indicator "no" and the group 3 indicator "unless"?

I keep seeing conflicting information about how to translate this effectively. Wouldn't the (Group 3) "unless" negate the clause directly after and turn it into the sufficient condition?

Consequently, wouldn't the "no" (Group 4) indicator negate the necessary condition, the final product of this final premise being /explictly request cancellation> subscription will be cancelled?

10/11 ON FIRST RUN 11/11 BR LETS GOOOOO

Raging because I thought the question was about the authors view

19 MINUTES BUT GOT IT WOOOOOH

20 minutes but I diagrammed everything and bulletproofed the argument all on my own

The previous lesson on shallow dip was so good. I'M PRAYING THIS WASN'T A COINCIDENCE.

@Haleh Literally was thinking the same thing and why I couln't solve this first try

Why is it that the moment I read the answer choices I get an inclination to select the right answer, but after trying to reason the answer choice out using JYs methods I second guess myself and choose the wrong choices over and over?

Why do these feel easier than the previous sections strengthen questions?

2/5 and then 5/5 on BR. All of my wrong answers were the result of second guessing myself unfortunately.

Fuck this fucking question man

Finally got one right, and it's a 1* lol.

I spent 10 minutes on this trying to draw out a convoluted conditional statement and still got this wrong. This literally feels hopeless.

@SavanahHoffstein Thanks for the spoilers