- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
I read this as a strengthen question and it totally threw me off. Pay attention to the question
I totally misunderstood the use of "abnormally' here. I thought it was referring to the fatality# being extremely high in general, that is, compared to all other roads. I did not take it as extremely high for that particular road for that particular year
Got this one wrong because I read ambivalent as ambiguous, and I thought the "might" was too weak to be strongly supportive
For some reason this passage appeared in the critique/debate passage drill so I've already seen these questions
@NunyaBizNiz This gave me a bit of trouble too - I initially took it as "if a crop" or "any crop" in a conditional. A crop is just referential
So if the premise was "Senator Amidala will deliver her speech if the assassination plot fails" would make the conclusion valid?
How does the company not needing the protection make it have no purpose? The disclaimer could still offer a degree of legal protection even if it is not strictly necessary.