Olsas says the admission committees of the law schools reserve the right to apply their own evaluation. But will they really see my original transcript and realize 3.3 can’t really represent my academic performance? Does they solely rely on the WES result?
I just finished my exam on 10th Feb and about to do the writing section. I was wondering if there is any lesson or materials I can take a look to prepare for the writing section. Thanks a lot:)
If we satisfy the necessary condition, we don’t know if the sufficient condition will happen. Which means the sufficient condition may or may not happen. Then why C is wrong? #help
For answers choice E. What if the Mars is indeed a practical source of basic materials but it doesn’t contain much enough material for colony establishment so space transportation is still necessary? The conclusion will still remains that it’s not economically feasible to do colonize to Mars. In this case, negate this answer choice won’t wreck the argument. Then how can this be necessary assumption? #help Or being “practical “ means it can offer tremendous materials?
Prove me wrong please I am so confused. Lying is all but inescapable means lying can be everything but not inescapable so lying is escapable, which means lying is not necessary. But why he says that sentence means lying is necessary? #help
For Q19 answer choice D, does comparable mean consistent? #help
How do you deal with this type questions? I am so confused. Watch the video by JY in CC. It looks simple but when I am doing it my brain is jammed…
Can anyone give me an example of answer choice B please? Thank you! #help
What the courses teaching Morgan law? I can’t find them… #help
Where they mentioned it’s a revival ???#help
I registered the exam on Feb but I feel I am not prepared for it and kinda wanna cancel it. Will the schools I will apply know that I cancelled and never took a test?
Can we start register for the February test now?
interested!!!
@blank20202021972 said:
Definitely drill these question types until they become second nature. What I do for easily identifying a diagramming question is to highlight/look for the logical indicators every time.
So every time I see a logic indicator, I just go ahead and diagram?
When should I diagram while doing LR? I always read it, think about it, take an answer choice, and get it wrong. Didn't even realize that I need to diagram until I watch the explanation. Even when I diagram, it takes me about 1 minute to think and realize I do need to do it for this question, but it'll take me about 2-3 minutes (and I may get it wrong). I think I should know when to diagram so as to decide whether to do it or flag and skip...
Are we supposed to spot a flaw/loophole when we encounter a parallel reasoning question? (Not flaw reasoning questions.)
There are two necessary condition indicators in answer choice C. Can anyone help me translate that? I am so confused… #help
So the financial market example can just be ignored? I think I got played by that part lol #help
@claudiod0140833 said:
A necessary assumption is necessary for the conclusion to be true. If the necessary assumption is false, the conclusion cannot stand. For NA questions, you want to find an assumption that, if false, would prevent the conclusion from being true.
So it's between premises and conclusion?
So answer choice A means someone was in the house pulling/pushing the door right at that moment? #help
Is the answer choice of a NA question supposed to be a necessary assumption only between premises and conclusion or it can also be a necessary assumption between premises?
Where is the bi conditional lesson in cc? I think I need to review it lol~ #help
I have a hard time recognize bi condition rules... Any idea plz?
What a relief! Thank you so much !