#feedback This video is missing time stamps for answer choices.

These two conclusions got me.

The GRE called. It wants its question back.

#help the question explanations start with many of the answers already eliminated.

#feedback This video lacks time stamps for answer choices.

Dang, confused the main conclusion with the sub-conclusion and got got.

Process of elimination saved me here.

So meta.

I misread this one and thought it asked for the information inside the parentheses rather than immediately preceding it. Proceeded to waste time on the wrong answer.

"No plan survives first contact" -- me wading through this question.

Almost picked A until realizing that the causal issue of germs was absent--A doesn't help the same way that E does.

Decoupling the timelines of 1) skin cancer development from 2) sunscreen use helped me conceptually to pick B.

My intuition told me C was correct because it was the only one dealing with a different sample type than the others.

Well that was humbling.

Great example of a purely logical exercise where the words (chordate, etc.) don't really matter.

Well that question was no fun.

This was a very weirdly worded question. Totally tripped me up.

#Feedback Seeing the two different explanations from JY and Kevin was helpful. This is the first time I saw a question with two explanations on here--recommend adding more.

Came back to this lesson after studying/drilling for 4 months and plateauing largely due to challenges with necessity/sufficiency issues on more advanced questions.

Sample size of 1 here. I completed the core curriculum and then got Loophole after that to ensure I wasn't missing certain connections. I think the 7Sage core curriculum is far more comprehensive than Loophole, though the way Loophole approaches certain concepts may help bring some clarity if not simply because it is a different perspective.

I received this accommodation. There is a fill-in-the-blank section on the part of the accommodation request asking which accommodations you want. You just type in "Remove experimental section." This was all it took in terms of justification/writing. FYI, this is not on the documentation you fill out--just in the web-based accommodation screen you fill out before submitting your qualified professional form and any other substantiating documents.

Sometimes the LSAT has really interesting questions.

I got this right by viewing it as a necessary assumption question rather than a PSA.

The Star Wars reference to Darth Vader being influenced by Obi Wan but not turning out the same way helped clarify really well why B is wrong.

I eliminated E on shallow dip because it introduced a third person. Dang.

How can this be a 1 star question?