I wish there was an app to download on other devices like iPads

@boatengad112 I did this too - reading the above comment helped clarify a little though. I also don't think we need to be too worried about doing this since the video mentions this exercise is hard to do with sentences not in the context of an argument. I don't think I would've kicked "whose economies rely predominantly on trade" if the conclusion of the overall argument ended up being something that wasn't a Kingdom of Westeros whose economy relied solely on trade.

@MyaPapaya the subject of the first statement is "pet adoption centers." What about pet adoption centers? They need to have an interactive website AND to be a 501(c)(3) nonprofit to be eligible for the grant. You could technically take "pet adoption center" out of that and just make your lawgic statements like this:

interactive website + 501(c)(3) non profit -> eligible for the grant

@katieghart01 thank you!

For #2, on the explanation portion I can understand how the first sentence "One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species." is just the statement of a fact. At first though, I thought it could be a premise that was supported by the rest that followed. Anyone have any tips on how to distinguish that this isn't an argument?