Mr. fat cat!!!!

same. its so annoying bc it seems so clear when JY reviews it but I dont get to that conclusion in the moment. ughhhhhh

seriously agree #feedback

Negating "all" "some" "most" claims is negating the underlying relationship.

take the opposite of what the terms stand for.

most- more than half -> negated = anywhere from 1 to half.

some- more than one -> negated = none

all- every one-> negated = some

might be wrong here but I think few is less than some!

OMG I THINK I GET IT!

take for example: Some students in Ms. Smiths class are in theater club.

Imagine in your mind that you went into Ms. Smiths class, grabbed a handful of students, and that each of them are in fact members of the theater club. That would be your SOME.

What about the rest of the students though? Odds are that they are in theater club too. Therein lies your ALL.

Its not so much that some directly translates to all- but more so that some does not negate the rest, and that all might be part if the same group.

Hope this makes sense, if i'm wrong feel free to correct me!

yeah I have to say- as much as i'm willing to bend my natural instincts to fit LSAT logic, I just cannot accept that some could mean all. like, what??

Mr. Fat Cat 🗣️ 🗣️ 🗣️ 🗣️