Hi, I was working through the curriculum today with no problems but a few minutes ago the green checkmarks and stars disappeared from the v2 syllabus and I couldn't click "Blind Review" or "see results" on the drills. Anyone else having this problem?
#help Question 6 -- when you use the negate necessary rules I got this: /Attend -> /RSVP but that's wrong. How should you go about this problem? (If I just use my own logic I can just cancel out the negatives to get Attend -> RSVP but that goes against the negate necessary rules.)
Anyone understand why for Question 2, each of the two answers is broken into two lines without arrows attached? for example the second answer goes from /S to /J with no arrows. #help
can anyone explain why this question DOESN'T just pertain to straight stretches of high-speed roadways? That's all the question stem talks about... #help
I noticed that the v2 curriculum is MUCH shorter than v1, partly due to fewer practice tests. I know that's because there probably aren't that many tests that have two sets of LR, but will the lack of practice tests be a detriment to my preparation for exams Aug 2024 onward?
#help why doesn't 3.1 have a premise/ conclusion?
I thought "Linguists have conducted many comparative analyses of traditional languages from various regions and eras" supports the statement "Human communication is a universal phenomenon that has existed across different civilizations over time." because of the fact that linguists have analysed languages from different regions and eras.
Isn't "only" group 2 necessary? The video says the lawgic is group 1 sufficient. I thought it was supposed to be irresponsible →handwriting analysts #help
#Help for answer choice D I thought the fact that was incompatible with the typological theory was that it "does not count sibling species as separate species" which would in fact show the theory to be false? But I guess that statement is not necessary incompatible with the typological theory? I'm so confused lol