kaylancarlson
- Joined
- Feb 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 172
CAS GPA
3.5
1L START YEAR
2027
Applications
Berkeley
Berkeley
Pacific (Mcgeorge)
Pacific (Mcgeorge)
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
UC - Davis
UC - Davis
UC Law San Francisco
UC Law San Francisco
USF
USF
Discussions
kaylancarlson
Wednesday, Aug 19
Went to look at the explanation for this one and it just says "stated." Feeling dumb as hell rn
kaylancarlson
Monday, Jul 20
This doesn’t make a ton of sense to me, since the premise clearly states “in order to stimulate economic growth.” So isn’t that what we should be focusing on?
kaylancarlson
Tuesday, Apr 21
D was the one that I was positive was NOT correct. Make it make sense…
Saying "time spent in traffic or at stoplights" to me is equal to emitting low pollutants or not at all. Idk about y'all but my car is usually still moving a bit in traffic... aka emitting low pollutants. Dumb question made even more dumb by the fact that cars at stoplights ALSO still have emissions.