For 26, A talks about the number of Mexican Americans, whereas the passage talks about the proportion of Mexican Americans.

@maecyarthur733 Unfortunately based on reddit discussion I think the really hard female author comparative passage was from the real section...*sigh

Had RC - LG - RC - LR

LR was fair. LG was pretty straightforward until the last game which I pretty much guessed. My first RC had one passage about paternalistic law & working hours and was in general okay. The second RC was BRUTAL. The first two passages with about 8 questions each, and the comparative passage was about a female author (I believe) and I was totally destroyed by it. Read it twice but still couldn't answer most of the questions and ended up just guessing random answers.

@josephbraun996 Same and I sort of screwed up LR as well. I had LR-LG (incredibly tough one) - RC - LG (easy one) and I was thinking about cancelling my score throughout the 10 min break LOL.

@josephbraun996 I really hope that one's real cuz I got two LGs and I def FAILED the first one

@dianao6512815 Do you by any chance remember the questions from your LG section? Did you get something about fencing competitions? I got LR-LG-RC-LG

Interested!

The way I arrived at A was that according to Ringer, Beethoven left Austria to look for "creative models" and that "its reasonable to suppose that London musicians who composed music for such an instrument at its critical phase of development no small degree of influence on continental musicians." I was thinking if there were innovative music for the Brentwood piano in Austria, then the influence on Continental musicians may come not from the London musicians but Austrian musicians.

Anyone knows if you can take the US exam outside the US since everything's online?

"what a load of crap."

lol

I fly quite often but still it didn't occur to me as I was working on this problem that one airplane could fly multiple trips per day ...

I'm prolly too dumb to be a lawyer *sigh

#help

I got the question right but can anyone tell me if my line of reasoning is correct?

So basically I translated the stimulus as X-> Y, where as

X=student failure

Y=things that are caused by bad teaching

*this is different from JY's translation, since I flipped the sufficient and necessary condition

so the argument goes:

X-->Y student failures are (things that are) caused by bad teaching

~X student failures disappeared

--------------

~Y bad teaching disappeared (teaching improved)

I interpreted D in a similar fashion:

X=workers who filed complaints

Y=people(really, workers or whoever) didn't have enough to do

and D follows the same structure and has the same flaw as the stimulus

Tryin SO hard to find an answer that resolves the scientists' findings when the answer turned out to be just a paraphrase of a sentence in the stimulus *sigh

I think yes. And also based on the stimulus, it doesn't have to be the case that the cloud must surrender more (or less or equal percentage of) O18 than it retains, because the proportion of O18 a cloud typically surrenders was never given in the stimulus.

I could be wrong but I think the scientists were surprised because say if the cloud formed over the Atlantic contained 100 units of O18, when it was measured again at the end of its journey, there were still 100 units of O18, when the cloud should've surrendered some O18 as it rained in the Amazon forest.

lol I did not even catch what exception meant when I was doing the problem. I was so confused until watching JY's explanation and realized that not campaigning against the incumbent from one's neighborhood was the exception

rip me

does the target time refer to a rough estimate of the amount of time that an average lsat taker needs to tackle the question?

#help