The LSAT writers are evil motherfuckers.
#feedback #help
In terms of how to translate the stim, couldn't you just rewrite the sentence using "unless"?
"Manuscripts written by first-timers do not get attention unless they are celebrities."
It says the exact same thing and allows for a translation to be easily made.
I'm scheduled to take my first test in August and am about 7 points away from my ideal score. My RC is pretty strong and I'm confident that won't weigh me down. But LR is a bit tricky for me, specifically the 4/5 difficulty questions. Obviously that makes sense, they're supposed to be the hardest ones. But I need to start getting more of them right if I want to break through to my target score. Any advice on how to get better at those LR questions?
For those who have taken a real lsat before, did you feel that you had time to physically map out parts of these parallel flaw/reasoning questions during the test?
My brother, out here in the real world, easy = not difficult. If you say otherwise, I suggest you see a doctor.
I would be pretty upset if a question like 5 showed up on my actual lsat. That's just a dumb question with bad answer choices.
Had the best team in the city until they all entered the portal to get more NIL money
You could pretty easily make the argument that having anything to eat and drink at a party necessarily makes it good. (But I would assume the people who wrote this have never been invited to a party, so I guess they wouldn't know.)
This question is silly and goofy! I simply love learning to think exactly how the lsat writers think! Forget law school, I just wanna be an lsat writer!
I got 13 wrong and after watching this video, I'm convinced none of those are the right answer. I understand that the question stem said "suggests," but the passage didn't suggest that MANY other guilds exercised influence over their members. We just know that there were some (at least two) guilds who enforced professional standards. Who's to say if that means MANY guilds did? But alas, the lsat writers are always right, even when they're wrong.
I understand this question but I really don't believe you could possibly know which conclusion the professor is truly trying to drive home. Sure, "similarly" is used to begin the second one, but what you take away from this depends entirely upon how you individually read this. I would give this prof a F- for his attempt at teaching.
Ooooo I'm an LSAT writer and I like to use words in ways that no one ever has and no one ever will again
I'll tell you one thing, I may not have answered this correctly, but neither did the LSAT writers.