User Avatar
kylereinhard6
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
kylereinhard6
Wednesday, Aug 31 2016

@ This is important, yes! Right now, I've just been going with the bottom one here—the classic!—because I already had one in my drawer:

However, I've heard that bleed-through to the back of the page could potentially be a problem, so I'm going to test it out soon with an "official" version of a PrepTest (just in case it's a slightly different type of paper from what I've been PTing with) to see if it's an issue, and if so, I'll consider switching to a gel one!

User Avatar

Wednesday, Aug 31 2016

kylereinhard6

A plug for using a highlighter on RC!

My apologies if this has been discussed better here before and I'm just missing it! Everything I've been able to find specifically on the 7Sage Discussion boards has been pretty wishy-washy in general about it, so I figured I'd post.

I know that success using particular “methods” (e.g., specific notation systems, margin-writing, etc.) in RC is typically pretty idiosyncratic and that what works for one person might be entirely unhelpful for another, but I want to sing the praises of a tool that I haven’t really seen suggested too much elsewhere (and in fact, that I’ve seen a few actively discourage):

The highlighter! Hear me out.

I didn’t even realize it was acceptable to use a highlighter during the actual test until recently because it doesn't seem to get talked about much, and I definitely did not expect it to help me, but it totally has. If you're like me and feel like the passages are a blur and the answers sometimes feel like total shots-in-the dark because you're so rushed and stressed, this honestly might help you get a little bit more certainty and confidence.

I’ve been putting my pencil down during my initial read and focusing just on understanding the passage and its structure, and then going through with the highlighter during a much briefer second pass and marking up everything that seems like it’ll be helpful to have for the questions (names, dates, details, shifts—anything that seems like answer-fodder, really). For me, this serves two purposes: 1) it quickly reacquaints me with the passage's overall structure in light of having just finished it (which can be quite helpful for a tricky main point question), and 2) it (obviously) makes the information easier to locate quickly.

It might just be me, but I feel like—since I've been staring solely at #2 pencil chickenscratch and black ink for months and months during prep and it can all start to feel like extraneous clutter at a certain point—the yellow of the highlighter stands out and really helps me organize the info visually. I’ve gone from missing 5-6 per RC section (on the newer tests) and sometimes not finishing on time to only about 2-3 misses on average (and in time, even with spending about 4 minutes upfront on the passage). For someone trying to go from consistent 169ish to consistent 172ish, these 2-3 extra points are huge for me!

Now I WILL GRANT YOU the possibility that this is all placebo and my actual improvement might simply stem from increased familiarity with RC (and no doubt that's a big part of it too), but the highlighting method really has, at least at this stage of prep for me, helped me feel more confident about my understanding of the passage. It feels like having a great setup for a logic game and being able to breeze right through the questions.

Anyway, if you're banging your head against the wall with RC and wrote off using a highlighter because you thought you couldn't spare the time, I'd say give it a shot! If it doesn't work for you, that's okay—but maybe it will!

User Avatar
kylereinhard6
Saturday, Sep 24 2016

My timing was way off and I felt like I bombed my first LG section (which turned out to be the experimental, thankfully), so I am actually excited that the computer virus section was real!

That game was super brutal—I still don't really know if my setup was valid, honestly—but the other games were so easy that I had like 15 minutes to slog through it and I feel like I must have gotten at least 3 right just by brute force alone.

The LR section with the "misinterpreted word" question had some uncharacteristically tough questions in the first 15, I thought, but other than that, the test was pretty business-as-usual! Definitely felt like maybe a few more curveballs than usual, though.

User Avatar
kylereinhard6
Thursday, Oct 20 2016

I am in the same boat right now. 10 points lower than what I was PTing at! Studied for 9 months, and for the last 3 months before September 24th was putting in an honest-to-goodness 35 hours a week on the test. Was PTing at about 171 (with a high of 175 a week before the test!) and found out today I got a 160, which was two points BELOW my diagnostic! I have literally never scored that low, and don't know what happened. Since I finished the 7sage core curriculum, I haven't even scored below a 167.

I really, really thought I wouldn't have to retake, but I feel like I have no choice now since I know I'm capable of more. Now, of course, I'm worried that no amount of preparation is actually going to help me, which is a fear I know I can't let get to me.

I'm going to focus on being extremely healthy and in my best shape both physically and mentally for the test, in addition to making sure I stay super sharp, skills-wise. I haven't even looked at an LSAT question since the test so I know it's going to be painful to go back, but I can't just walk away with a score so below my capabilities.

User Avatar
kylereinhard6
Wednesday, Oct 19 2016

You guys, I am seriously crushed. I was PTing at 171 for WEEKS and got a 160. My highest score was a 175, just a week before the test. I'm honestly devastated.

I guess I'm going to re-take, but the wind is so much out of my sails. I felt like I was as prepared as I ever could've been, and I got a 160!?? I'm about to cry.

User Avatar
kylereinhard6
Monday, Mar 14 2016

I'm in as well!

User Avatar
kylereinhard6
Saturday, Sep 03 2016

@ honored you gave it a shot, HEARTBROKEN it didn't work out for you

Confirm action

Are you sure?