User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Thursday, Jan 16 2025

Thanks everyone!

0
User Avatar

Friday, Jan 10 2025

laurenwaits126

LSAT test centers: Touchpads or computer mice?

Are both options available, or only one, and if so, which one? I'm studying on a laptop using just the touchpad. Seems like a mouse would be quicker, but I want to practice with as much similarity to the test center as possible. Please advise. Thanks!

0
User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Tuesday, Jan 07 2025

Hey, I'm in Atlanta and registered for the April LSAT. Strongly prefer daytime hours, which I know doesn't work for everyone. Please keep me posted if you guys decide to get together and I'll try to join you.

1
User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Saturday, Jan 04 2025

I am so interested in this remark and the comments below.

All I can personally offer, having been married to an attorney for almost 30 years, is that if you expect to work in the legal profession, you are definitely going to hear some foul language. Maybe you could think of the fairly mild expressions here on 7Sage as just another part of toughening up your skin for law school and beyond. Namaste.

0
User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Friday, Jan 03 2025

Thanks!

0
User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Thursday, Jan 02 2025

I had the same thought, but in looking at it again, I think sentence 2 in Q5 is just a premise and not a sub conclusion. Imagine if sentences 3 & 4 did not exist. It's easier to see that "...restaurants are storing food waste" and "...this is not sustainable" are each stand-alone statements, they don't actually affect each other. It's (deliberately!) confusing because sentence 2 is an opinion about sentence--but they don't actually depend on one another to be true. Does that help?

2
User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Thursday, Jan 02 2025

I got Q2 wrong at first too, because despite the warning that not all questions have conclusions, my brain was trying to make it into an argument. In Q2 it's clear that each sentence really stands alone as a fact and the information does not support--relate to--any of the other sentences. I figure that with this question 7Sage is just trying to hone our ability to recognize when arguments are present vs. when they are not. Q2 refers to scientists 'concluding' things, but this is just tricky language to see if we can recognize that just because the word "conclusion" is used in some way, doesn't make it the kind of logical argument conclusion that we are learning to identify.

0
User Avatar
laurenwaits126
Thursday, Jan 02 2025

Newcomer here! If one gets all of the problems in this (or any) section correct, is it safe to assume they can move on without reviewing the explanations?

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?