It keeps showing "The requested URL was not found on this server."
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
What the conclusion tells us is that in the domain of their claim,
Take it seriously → Interesting or /Trivial
/Interesting and Trivial → /Take it seriously
Translation: If we take it serously, then it is interesting or it is not trivial. If it is not interesting and it is trivial, then we do NOT take it seriously.
The translation of answer choice C is Trivial → /Take it seriously. This matches the conclusion.
Does anyone know when this will end?
Pages some /Work.
Yes, but C also uses the phrase "forage." So maybe in this question, "forage" also includes bringing the food back home?
A is wrong because it is not supported by the stimulus. The only way that A can be right is that the stimulus adds something like "most of the eggs will not hatch." In that way, we can negating the necessary condition (most eggs hatching), which leads to the negation of the sufficient condition (SW).
B is wrong because the second sentence already states that in all these three countries, the committees are very successful in reducing injuries.
It is objective because it does not contain words like "should."
You really should put this exercise in later sections. We don't know what argument part is yet.
#help 00:58 You said that on the LSAT we almost never attack the premise. Does it mean we sometimes have to attack the premise?
Your comments about the control group are very misleading. This is clearly a observational study. A observational study is where nothing changes and you just record what you see, but an experimental study is where you have a control group and a testable group. There is no control group in Y's study.