- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I sent all my applications in December, and I've received 2 WL so far (albeit they were reach schools). The other 10 target schools are pending a decision, and I wondered if it's too late to send additional material like a diversity statement to help with my application? I just thought of an excellent topic for my diversity statement and am unsure if sending it will be beneficial for my application. (I also feel very sure that this statement is much stronger than my personal statement, I just regret not thinking about this topic back then).
If it's not ideal for sending a diversity statement now, should I wait until I get WL to send the diversity statement along with a LOCI? Or am I just too late?
@kimmelsara198 said:
Yes it is disciplinary action. The addendum section is going to be for your addenda such as GPA, LSAT, Resume, etc, if you have any. If there is a specific section for a given topic, use that section.
The disciplinary action was GPA related, so should I refer to the GPA addendum statement within my disciplinary action statement?
For my application, there are two sections: disciplinary action and addendum. The disciplinary action question reads: "Have you ever been subject to disciplinary action for academic or other reasons in any of the colleges, universities, graduate, or professional schools you have attended"
Long story short, I dropped out of college a long time ago, received three academic probation in a row, and was academically dismissed. Does this count as disciplinary action, or do I talk about this for the addendum section?
Got this one correct in less than 30 seconds.
Since an accurate count restricts fishing (premise), we cannot trust the fishing industry (conclusion). Therefore, the government should institute a program that will trick the fishing industry into handing over dead carcasses.
This assumes that the fishing industry doesn't know what the government is doing and it also assumes the industry will not catch on fast. So the answer must be that the fishing industry will catch on fast.
AC B: If it only takes a few seabirds to learn about the toxins, then the fishing industry will catch on fast and only hand over a few samples, thus it will still be an inaccurate count. The answer is basically the descriptive flaw reworded.
Two RC, bombed the first one with sentimentalism and cowbirds (prob got -15ish), but really enjoyed the second RC (nigeria language). RC/RC/LG/LR. Can someone reassure me that the Nigeria language was the real one?
I hate reading passages, I hate economic reading passages even more, but I actually got an 8/8 on this! Took me 10:30, but slowly improving... #GettingBetterEveryDay
I was wondering if anyone has a list of econ and geology passages. I have a hard time parsing through these types of passages and I want to love reading them. If they have a high amount of infer/analogy questions that would be a great bonus too.
Thanks!
Edit: Jazz/blues also
@aagui167763 said:
LG was rough for me lol and I usually get perfect on that section...yikes
Dude... I just took it and I usually get -0-1 on LG as well, but the last game was the most confusing thing ever! I had 18 minutes to finish the last game but I just could not do it....
Science and math is usually my strong point, but if I ever get a geology passage, I am screwed!!!
#help
Is it saying that if
e.g. there are ten small observational studies for every one large randomized trial (premise), each small observational study has a higher chance of being dramatic than a large randomized trial? (conclusion)
In which case, AC D is saying that is not the case, but you fail to notice that small observational studies are more common, so thats why you see more dramatic findings in SoS than in LrT.
I eliminated C because it wasn't employees that implement ideas, it was employers who implement ideas.
The flaw is that fat has nothing to do with cancer, since it is only a correlation. Environmental pollution also has nothing to do with fat intake, it is just a correlation.
C is the same as E. We only need 1 responsible analyst to strengthen Gregory's response. D closes that flaw.
What I am saying is, I already know the rules, they are so obvious, and since the proctors require you to read them to start the exam, I want to read them as a habit for each prep-test I do.
@dhisais52 said:
Ehh... Honestly, I just wouldn't do it. Just learn the rules in advance and don't worry about reading them on test day. Seriously, you should reserve every single ounce of mental energy on the actual test, not its rules.
But on test day, the proctor makes you read them before you start the test. (I took the feb flex). So I want to get into a habit when the day comes again.
I remember having to read the test rules before beginning my LSAT-Flex. I want to do this each time before I begin my preptest. Does anyone have the link for this? Thank you!
Posting to save this post... I work Mon/Tue/Sat but I will be attending these as much as I can.
I recently asked one more professor to write me a letter of recommendation. She wrote and sent it to me around mid Feb. If I plan to apply for admissions again this Oct/Nov, will it be okay to reuse the letter of recommendation without needing to ask to reuse?
If you need help with this question, this is literally the exact same thing as lsat 59 section 3, question 19.
Okay, thank you! So I have to book the hotel myself and then they’ll compensate me after?
Hello I requested accommodation for quiet environment for the Feb LSAT next week. Has anyone received an email regarding this? I’ve been checking my email/spam everyday for them and nothing has been posted. There was a message on my LSAC account that I would receive something from them no later than Feb 9, which has since been deleted.
@kimmelsara198 said:
I would write two separate addenda: one that discusses your probation and dismissal for the disciplinary action section, and one discussing the effect on your GPA. These, though related, need to be addressed individually as one is a mandatory character and fitness disclosure and the other is an optional addenda.
Do you mind if I send you both of my addenda? I just feel they are one and the same, its hard to write two separate addenda without reiterating the same facts.