#help

Is it saying that if

e.g. there are ten small observational studies for every one large randomized trial (premise), each small observational study has a higher chance of being dramatic than a large randomized trial? (conclusion)

In which case, AC D is saying that is not the case, but you fail to notice that small observational studies are more common, so thats why you see more dramatic findings in SoS than in LrT.

I am confused with AC B. I understand the other ACs weakens the argument but does AC B strengthen the argument at all? Or is it just a totally random AC with no bearing to the argument?

#help (Added by Admin)

I eliminated C because it wasn't employees that implement ideas, it was employers who implement ideas.

The flaw is that fat has nothing to do with cancer, since it is only a correlation. Environmental pollution also has nothing to do with fat intake, it is just a correlation.

C is the same as E. We only need 1 responsible analyst to strengthen Gregory's response. D closes that flaw.

If you need help with this question, this is literally the exact same thing as lsat 59 section 3, question 19.

Two RC, bombed the first one with sentimentalism and cowbirds (prob got -15ish), but really enjoyed the second RC (nigeria language). RC/RC/LG/LR. Can someone reassure me that the Nigeria language was the real one?

I hate reading passages, I hate economic reading passages even more, but I actually got an 8/8 on this! Took me 10:30, but slowly improving... #GettingBetterEveryDay

Exactly what I need, thank you!

What I am saying is, I already know the rules, they are so obvious, and since the proctors require you to read them to start the exam, I want to read them as a habit for each prep-test I do.

@ said:

Ehh... Honestly, I just wouldn't do it. Just learn the rules in advance and don't worry about reading them on test day. Seriously, you should reserve every single ounce of mental energy on the actual test, not its rules.

But on test day, the proctor makes you read them before you start the test. (I took the feb flex). So I want to get into a habit when the day comes again.

@ said:

LG was rough for me lol and I usually get perfect on that section...yikes

Dude... I just took it and I usually get -0-1 on LG as well, but the last game was the most confusing thing ever! I had 18 minutes to finish the last game but I just could not do it....

Okay, thank you! So I have to book the hotel myself and then they’ll compensate me after?

Science and math is usually my strong point, but if I ever get a geology passage, I am screwed!!!

blank

@ said:

I would write two separate addenda: one that discusses your probation and dismissal for the disciplinary action section, and one discussing the effect on your GPA. These, though related, need to be addressed individually as one is a mandatory character and fitness disclosure and the other is an optional addenda.

Do you mind if I send you both of my addenda? I just feel they are one and the same, its hard to write two separate addenda without reiterating the same facts.

@ said:

Yes it is disciplinary action. The addendum section is going to be for your addenda such as GPA, LSAT, Resume, etc, if you have any. If there is a specific section for a given topic, use that section.

The disciplinary action was GPA related, so should I refer to the GPA addendum statement within my disciplinary action statement?

Posting to save this post... I work Mon/Tue/Sat but I will be attending these as much as I can.