I met a girl who was in the same room I was in. She had only one pencil, no eraser, no ziplock, no analog watch... She dressed like she came to a beach. Before the exam, I asked her if she was ready and if she took any prep class( I told her about 7sage). She said she bought "PS Bible" books one and half weeks ago and did not take any prep course. I did not see hear after the break. Some people think LSAT is a joke.

Thank you all.

Thanks to both of you.

@alexroark5906, Yes, I was. Thanks again.

Thanks to both of you.

Thank you all.

Last 3 PTs that I took are 70-71 and 74. I think I will take rest for couple of days. Thanks for your time and suggestions.

I am not nervous at all. I got 158-162 on all PTs from PT #55-69. BR was fine, too. Thanks for your suggestions.

Thanks

"Either Or" rule ( /C--> D) is different from "not both" rule( C-->/D)

Answer choice A must be false, because it says " /EW--> I D" = /ID-->EW, while we know /ID is sufficient for /EW, i.e. if /ID takes place, then /EW has to take place.

D is incorrect, because it says " /EW-->PC" while we know EW-->PC. Here S.C. failed, so rule is irrelevant. Therefore, N.C. could be true or could be false. However, it does not have to be false.

I got this question right based on the following, although I am not sure if I am right.

Stimulus states that some people develop heart disease because of high cholesterol while some people don't ( Existential quantifier) describing a causal relationship, and dietary changes affect cholesterol level.

However, the conclusion states "anyone"( a jump from E.Q. to U.Q.), which is a flaw.

Answer choice C states this.

I like it. J.Y. gets mad when reading the wrong answer choices.

anne2hoang , you are the best

I am interested, too. I am available any time any day.

I think you are right. D is a premise/example to the conclusion/E.

Besides, what David Michael-1-1 said, stimulus says operating expenses are much lower when exceptionally low wages are paid. This does not mean paying lowest wages will result in lowest operating expenses. Therefore, B is incorrect.

Would "A" be a correct answer if it says " At least some people's/somebody's rights will be violated" instead of " the rights of majority of people" ? I am little bit confused because "unequal distribution of political power" may not mean "greater share of political power."

I was able to pick C and eliminate remaining ACs using the following strategy:

Stimulus:

P: Every theory( Universal Quantifier/U.Q.)

C: Quantum Mechanics( a specific theory)

Tips:

1) This arg. is valid. So the correct answer choice(AC) has to have a valid arg.

2) This arg. is not flawed. ( if it is flawed, then LSAT writers usually mention it as flawed in the

question stem). Therefore, correct AC cannot be flawed.

3) P in the arg. is an U.Q., so the P in the correct AC has to be a U.Q.

4) C is on a specific theory, so the correct AC has to be on a specific one.

ACs:

A) Incorrect: P( few species) is an Existential Quantifier(E.Q.), NOT a U.Q. So just eliminate it.

B) Incorrect: P ( four companies) is NOT an U.Q.

C) Correct: P ( all/every chess) is a U.Q. ( matching the Arg. P). Concl is on a specific one. A good match.

D) Incorrect: P ( a specific virus) is not a U.Q.

E) Incorrect: it is a flawed argument( it is one of the common flaw arg. types: drawing a conclusion on the entire team while considering only a part of it).

J.Y., am I missing anything?

I live around Perimeter Mall. I am also planning to take it in June. Let's study together.