picked e because nothing else made sense lol... e didn't make sense either but seemed difficult enough to even parse that i was convinced lsac masters would pick this as the right answer choice
Hey! I am interested I am in vancouver!
lsac writers have outdone themselves with this question bows to them
Hey I would like to join please
If you are confused between two choices go for the weaker one C and D had me tweaking and I picked C because its way too weak to weaken the argument words like many, some, not all are weak
I am quite confused as to why 14c is wrong. I was going back and forth between A and C and i am not able to figure out how C is wrong! Pls help
Explanation video: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-2-questions/
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"
this passage literally killed me and the last question had me questioning my sanity
i literally haven't been able to relax since yesterday and now i cannot stop trippin i feel like what if i got the whole LR section wrong LOL idk!!! ugh
Okay I wrote my test on Friday and mine was RC LR LG LR the first LR i think it was pretty challenging but the second LR was so easy i hope the first was experimental
Hello everyone!
I am writing this post for the first time and I am hoping to get some insight. I am stuck in the 159-161 score range I have gotten a 163 on my second last PT but I did pt 80 right now and got a 159. Super sad. I have been studying for months now and my scores per section vary quite a bit sometimes I manage to go -3 on LR but then RC ends up being difficult and that tanks my score. I am hoping to get around a 164-166 and I am registered for the January exam. I feel pretty good with logic games and its my favorite section I typically go around -2 or 3 but trying to bring it to a 0. I also noticed for some reason i do perfect on all grouping games ang get one or two wrong on the easy level 1 difficulty sequencing game but during br i get it all right? any tips are appreciated pls!!
A is the answer because it attacks the assumption that across the board Placebo and Vit C group has the same level of severity in terms of acne because if it were worse it opens the possibility that Vit C is helpful! Thus making A right
i felt like A strengthens the argument because yes if the ability varies then perhaps it is true that environmental factors do not have a huge impact i kept it as a possible AC until I came across D
pathetic question but the best way to explain this is effect was there without cause (AC) which makes C the answer
Hi! I just got my jan mark back and i think im going to rewrite it. I got a mid 150s mark and my goal is mid 160s.. i have used almost all of the 7sage study material drilling wise and i have done the pt's in 80s and all of 90's including the latest the 93 prep test. I am super confused as to how i would restudy? how do i go about using the same material again
can you explain how you made a wrong answer journal
E completely shatters the argument! I was initially confused by C but what made me refrain from choosing it was "in part" because the argument never says in part because if it is in part it leaves the door open for perhaps "natural causes of the weather as well"
Chose E because it completely eliminates the possibility of this weather being a natural occurrence and it is something the author would agree with the rest of the answer felt out of scope