Subscription pricing
Hey 7Sagers,
Here's the official September 2022 LSAT Discussion Thread.
REMINDER: Under your Candidate Agreement, you may not discuss the details of any specific LSAT questions at any time. For the September LSAT, general discussion of what sections you had, or how difficult you found a given section, or speculation about which sections were scored or unscored, is prohibited until after 9pm ET, Tuesday, September 13th.
Posts that violate these rules will be taken down and may result in disciplinary action from LSAC. Let’s work together to ensure the test is fair to everyone, and not share information before everyone has taken the test.
Some examples of typical comments:
✅ The following comments are okay 🙆♀️
❌ The following comments are over the line 🙅♂️
Good luck to everyone taking the September LSAT!
**Please keep all discussions of the September 2022 LSAT here!**(/red)
7
45 comments
I just got an email that my session is on hold and under review. It may take a “few extra days” for my scores 😵💫 anyone else received this email?
28 hours left! I'm getting more freaked out by the minute. I have NO idea how I did, not the slightest idea! Which is probably a bad thing haha.
Why do they take so long to give us our scores? I'm dying over here. Hahaha.
Powerscore podcast on youtube breaks down which sections they think were experimental and how the curve might change depending on which test version you had. I had LG RC LR RC and a very hard RC section about GOYA from a past NOV 2020 LSAT.
I had LR RC RC LG and found one RC much harder than the other, hoping the hard one is experimental 😅
Okay I wrote my test on Friday and mine was RC LR LG LR the first LR i think it was pretty challenging but the second LR was so easy i hope the first was experimental
I took it Saturday and my sections went RC LR LG LR. The LG was pretty easy. RC was standard. My first LR was a bit easier than the second. I feel better than the first time I took the LSAT in Nov 2021 but I don’t think I reached my goal score. Does anyone else feel “indifferent” about their performance ?
@kevinhaominyan374
Hey there!
I had the same RC. I felt exactly the same as you did. Third passage was extremely convoluted and Fourth passage was reeeally strange. It was very unusual passage to read.
If you don't mind sharing, what's your average score?? You can also PM me if that's easier/more comfortable!
Thanks! :)
@jeremyortiz1995713 said:
@emaxcohen372 said:
Power score just tweeted that Sept Recap should be out tmrw, where they will reveal which sections were real and which were experimental.
link the tweet, i cant find it!
https://twitter.com/davekilloran/status/1569880629373960193?s=46&t=iuYWKMZuIn97LkMS5jmNmA
@emaxcohen372 said:
Power score just tweeted that Sept Recap should be out tmrw, where they will reveal which sections were real and which were experimental.
link the tweet, i cant find it!
Power score just tweeted that Sept Recap should be out tmrw, where they will reveal which sections were real and which were experimental.
@jeremyortiz1995713 said:
@lsegal3544 said:
I had LR LG LG RC. LR was medium difficulty, not easy not too hard, but challenging at times. the first LG was fine, standard games, one about formal/informal restaurants and one about journalists. the second LG had a misc game about fertilizer colors and a grouping game about duets, trios and solos. RC was also standard, maybe on the easier side.
did anyone with 1 LG section have the misc fertilizer red green & white game? trying to see whether this section was experimental or not
I'm wondering the same ^ the misc fertilizer and solo/duet/trio section also had a standard in(3)/out(5) game as well
@lsegal3544 said:
I had LR LG LG RC. LR was medium difficulty, not easy not too hard, but challenging at times. the first LG was fine, standard games, one about formal/informal restaurants and one about journalists. the second LG had a misc game about fertilizer colors and a grouping game about duets, trios and solos. RC was also standard, maybe on the easier side.
did anyone with 1 LG section have the misc fertilizer red green & white game? trying to see whether this section was experimental or not
@rgsimpson01280 said:
Alright. We’re after the 9pm ET deadline. Let the speculation commence.
I got LG/LR/LR/RC. LG? Oddly easy AF. First LR was appropriately difficult; second LR seemed to be a walk in the park. RC was pretty average, but I had an Arts section w/ choices that were sometimes uncomfortably vague. Felt like I couldn’t be 100% sure about some of those answers.
Without mentioning specifics, there were a lot of MSS questions in the second section or LR. I am hoping the first LR was experimental (lol of course), but I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
same here, PRAYING that first LR was experimental - i found it difficult, but found the 2nd LR to be easy
Had LG:RC:LR:RC
@kevinhaominyan374 said:
LG RC LR RC, Not going to lie the fourth RC is very difficult. It's weird. And the last passage seems to be sort of a research paper. very new to me..
I also had two RC sections, and the second was much more difficult compared to the first w/ a strange format!
LG RC LR RC, Not going to lie the fourth RC is very difficult. It's weird. And the last passage seems to be sort of a research paper. very new to me..
I had LR LG LG RC. LR was medium difficulty, not easy not too hard, but challenging at times. the first LG was fine, standard games, one about formal/informal restaurants and one about journalists. the second LG had a misc game about fertilizer colors and a grouping game about duets, trios and solos. RC was also standard, maybe on the easier side.
did anyone with 1 LG section have the misc fertilizer red green & white game? trying to see whether this section was experimental or not
Alright. We’re after the 9pm ET deadline. Let the speculation commence.
I got LG/LR/LR/RC. LG? Oddly easy AF. First LR was appropriately difficult; second LR seemed to be a walk in the park. RC was pretty average, but I had an Arts section w/ choices that were sometimes uncomfortably vague. Felt like I couldn’t be 100% sure about some of those answers.
Without mentioning specifics, there were a lot of MSS questions in the second section or LR. I am hoping the first LR was experimental (lol of course), but I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
I will be all over this board on 9/13 :)
How do you feel about the RC section?
proctor took way to long to connect and set up smh
I had a great experience with my proctor. He did not interrupt me at all. Honestly I could not tell which one was the experimental because they felt the same in range of difficulty or not.
I didn't have nearly as many problems as I know others have had before, but it took me ~35 minutes to get connected to a proctor and then fully checked in (my proctor seemed to be managing a lot of people at once so there were ~5 minute delays between each step). This being my first LSAT I unfortunately got pretty frazzled and nervy after that, and made some rookie mistakes diagramming and using my time overall on my first LG and ran out of time/had to select a couple random answers. Was able to recover after that and felt a lot better about later sections.
Was really hoping I wouldn't have to retake, since I don't need a particularly great score to get where I'm trying to go, but with that rocky LG section I'm feeling there's a 50-50ish chance I'll be hanging out here a couple more months!
Was everyone’s first section LR? I had an awful experience with my proctors.