This one got me twice!! I'm big mad but i think i get it now. I ruled out E because i messed up thinking that good and bad were opposites which led me to a cyclical idea that no good without bad, but if bad then not good so no bad blah blah whatever. But the stem just says that they cant have a good reputation, not that they must have a bad reputation

I'm a bit confused on why C is wrong still but the reasoning that makes sense to me is as follows.

Given all these conditions, it is possible that all well designed public places which feature artwork are not coffeehouses.

Is this statement true and is that what makes C the wrong answer?

#help (Added by Admin)

Are all causal relationships necessarily correlative as well? Are there any cases in which a causal relationship does not require correlation?

#help (Added by Admin)

Q10

Could we validly conclude "Charles must have been considered by whomever charged him to have had a high probability of knowing that he was carrying drugs"? Or does that fall out side of the scope of this question.

#help (Added by Admin)