- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I had the same mistake, I thought it was ambiguously worded since I misread
"Main Street Location" as being their "Main location on a street" which would've included the possibility of Walnut being their Main location.
I'm a bit confused on why C is wrong still but the reasoning that makes sense to me is as follows.
Given all these conditions, it is possible that all well designed public places which feature artwork are not coffeehouses.
Is this statement true and is that what makes C the wrong answer?
#help (Added by Admin)
Are all causal relationships necessarily correlative as well? Are there any cases in which a causal relationship does not require correlation?
#help (Added by Admin)
Q10
Could we validly conclude "Charles must have been considered by whomever charged him to have had a high probability of knowing that he was carrying drugs"? Or does that fall out side of the scope of this question.
#help (Added by Admin)
A —m→ B
A —m→ C
------------------
B←s→C
For example:
Most Cats are Grey
Most Cats have Spots
Some Cats are Grey and have Spots.
The reason we can know this is because "Most" as an indicator definitely requires over half of a given set. If we have 100 cats, then at least 51 will be Grey, and at least 51 will have spots. There is a necessary overlap, then, between both "Most" qualities.
To take it into more pure math, we can say that between 1 and 100, most numbers are less than 51, and that most numbers are greater than 49. Therefore, there must be some numbers which are both less than 51 and greater than 49. In this case it is clear that 50 satisfies our conclusion.
Hopefully this was helpful, if anyone sees something wrong with it please correct me, I'm also just learning all this.
This one got me twice!! I'm big mad but i think i get it now. I ruled out E because i messed up thinking that good and bad were opposites which led me to a cyclical idea that no good without bad, but if bad then not good so no bad blah blah whatever. But the stem just says that they cant have a good reputation, not that they must have a bad reputation