You say in the video that the less you smoke, the less likely it is you get lung cancer. Do all correlations move together if you negate them like this? I'm not certain that makes sense in reality... For example, if Walt quit after 30 years, and now he is a non-smoker, his likelihood of getting lung cancer will not "move together" with how much he smokes---his history of smoking still puts him at a high risk. In sum, can we negate causal relationships on the LSAT? or if it is reasonable to assume that certain causal relationships only move one way...
I must admit this is my second time around with the material and I kid you not this stuff is making more sense day by day. Now I just have to be able to see it on my practice test and do it quickly .
Are all causal relationships necessarily correlative as well? Are there any cases in which a causal relationship does not require correlation?
#help (Added by Admin)
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
14 comments
You say in the video that the less you smoke, the less likely it is you get lung cancer. Do all correlations move together if you negate them like this? I'm not certain that makes sense in reality... For example, if Walt quit after 30 years, and now he is a non-smoker, his likelihood of getting lung cancer will not "move together" with how much he smokes---his history of smoking still puts him at a high risk. In sum, can we negate causal relationships on the LSAT? or if it is reasonable to assume that certain causal relationships only move one way...
Thank you AP Psych
Correlation: 2 phenom that happen together; no concrete cause
I must admit this is my second time around with the material and I kid you not this stuff is making more sense day by day. Now I just have to be able to see it on my practice test and do it quickly .
time to rewatch breaking bad
Are all causal relationships necessarily correlative as well? Are there any cases in which a causal relationship does not require correlation?
#help (Added by Admin)