- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I just cannot understand how A is wrong, it says exactly what sub conclusion says
im so confused. if we take the contropositive of the conclusion, isnt it what the first sentence says?
because politicians can be honest but they wont be effective politicians.
I am confused why B is wrong because it says most research funded by the government gives rise to ethical dilemmas. The first sentence in the Q stem says "almost all research gives rise to ethical dilemmas". Since most of it is funded by the gov and almost all gives rise ton ethical dilemma so wont most of research funded by gov would give rise to ethical dilemma
at 2:13, "only" is used, since "only" is in group 2 so anything that comes right after it, isnt that necessary condition?
and from that logic, shouldnt the lawgic be fv->stress
How is B descriptively accurate and A isnt?