User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Tuesday, Aug 13 2024

This isn't scientific or exact, but as an older person studying for the LSAT, I would like to share my own experience. I started studying for the LSAT around the age of 30 full time (4-6hrs per day x 4 days a week) and after about year I didn't feel ready so I put it off and went back to work. During the 2 years that I worked, I studied part time (1-3hrs per day x 3 days a week) and at the end of those 2 years I didn't feel ready so I went back to studying full time. To make a long story short, during the next 4 years, I repeated the same study schedule and I finally took the LSAT two months ago in June. In summary, I studied a total of 4yrs full time (2yrs, worked, then another 2yrs) and I studied part time for about 3 years.

I scored a high 150s on the LSAT but never broke the 160s as was my goal. During my time studying, I took a 7sage class, hired a Testmasters tutor, and also hired a 7sage tutor. I took about 12 full PTs, completed the 7sage course, and drilled old passages, games, and questions endlessly. I definitely think my age and time away from undergrad affected my LSAT mastery. I don't have any other explanation since I personally feel that I did more than enough work and practice to warrant a higher score. I tend to believe that if you put in the work and effort, you'll get to your goal, and that just didn't happen in my case. So, I don't want to discourage you from going all in on the LSAT, but other factors outside of studying affected my comprehension on this test. Kind of sucks.

2
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Tuesday, Aug 13 2024

Focus on timing, being able to identify parts of an argument, and eliminating wrong answers. Being able to put all these skills together and applying them efficiently is how you start to master LR.

1
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Tuesday, Jul 02 2024

Retake. If you're not an older prospective law school applicant and/or don't have responsibilities that may prevent you from attending altogether, take another 8 months to a year to study, law school isn't going anywhere. The most important thing is that you attend a really good school with $. With a 3.9GPA, all you really need is a 160 to get into most schools outside the T21 and perhaps another 5 months with the help of a tutor can get you to your goal.

1
PrepTests ·
PT116.S2.Q1
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Saturday, Jun 29 2024

Exactly. JY doesn't do much explaining on this question. He just assumes we understand the inference in Romney's position. Not good.

2
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Monday, Jun 24 2024

Don't take too many PTs, you don't want to run out of practice tests, that can be a significant problem. Also, take the LSAT when you're ready and scoring above, at, or near your target score. The LSAT isn't going anywhere. Be patient and apply yourself to understanding and dominating the material.

0
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Wednesday, Jun 12 2024

I'm sad to see it go too. It was my strongest section throughout my prep and at times could be fun, compared to the other sections. Goodbye LG, we'll never forget you.

1
PrepTests ·
PT156.S4.Q6
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Friday, Jun 07 2024

Same: I selected A thinking that because Nomads hunted big game and because big game is dangerous, Nomads must have hunted small game. But we're not told Nomads hunted big game, we're told they're portrayed to have hunted big game. The portrayal doesn't support anything because it's false and so the conclusion is attacking this portrayal.

1
PrepTests ·
PT155.S1.Q19
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Tuesday, Jun 04 2024

In the moment, I didn't even think about the second definition of investing (use) since we're talking about businesses. Frustrating.

2
PrepTests ·
PT155.S1.Q5
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Tuesday, Jun 04 2024

I spent way too much time on this question. I think I got distracted by the idea of "toothless beaks and weak jaw muscles" and felt that this is somehow relevant.

5
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Sunday, Jun 02 2024

One of my frustrations at the moment is that I've been studying for more than a year and I've dedicated a lot of hours to LG and if I don't do well on LG or on the entire PT itself, all that work and time dedicated to that section goes down the drain. I'll definitely retake but all that I invested on LG will be for nothing if I don't do well on June 8th. Wish you could choose which sections you take.

0
PrepTests ·
PT158.S4.Q8
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Saturday, Jun 01 2024

I almost chose B, but at the last moment I realized my mistake and chose C. When you're going through the section, the pace and urgency to answer and move on to make sure you try to answer as many as possible really hurts you on crafty questions like this one.

2
PrepTests ·
PT158.S1.P3.Q14
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Saturday, Jun 01 2024

Tough passages. I hope the June LSAT isn't as tough as the last two passages of this section.

6
PrepTests ·
PT153.S1.P3.Q16
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Tuesday, May 28 2024

It would be nice to hear how JY would approach a question like #16 where you're forced to scan the entire passage for a few lines. Other than having a photographic memory, what else can you do to answer this question in under a minute? This RC section was particularly brutal.

8
PrepTests ·
PT152.S1.Q19
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Friday, May 24 2024

You have to be gifted to be able to dissect this argument and identify the right answer in less than 2mins and under pressure.

19
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Monday, May 20 2024

Do well on the LSAT (165 and above) and you've got a decent shot at a school in the 25 to 50 rank. Now, another option would be to improve your softs: work for a year or two, volunteer for an extended period, intern/clerk in a law related position, work on a political campaign, etc. Then write a great personal statement, get some letters of recommendation, and maybe take a course or two in a law related program. Then do well on the LSAT (165 and above) and perhaps you can break into the Top 25.

1
PrepTests ·
PT126.S2.P3.Q17
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Thursday, May 16 2024

Question 17 hinges on your understanding of the definition of "investing." If you don't know the secondary definition of that word, they hurt you. So unfair

4
PrepTests ·
PT126.S2.P3.Q14
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Thursday, May 16 2024

The problem with JY's economical approach to questions is that is assumes that you're correctly answering 75-90% of all the other questions that aren't curve breakers. Considering RC is by far the most difficult of the sections to improve upon, it's unfeasible to assume that you can guess on 3 or 4 questions and that won't hurt your RC score significantly. What if you missed 5 questions on 3 of the passages, and on passage 4 you miss another 2 questions and you decide to guess on two curvebreaker questions. Now, you're looking at -8 or -9 on the RC, which is disastrous.

0
PrepTests ·
PT137.S4.Q3
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Saturday, Feb 10 2024

D is wrong because it doesn't explain/resolve either of the situations in the stimulus. If we're told that consuming a lot of sugar leads to the inability of the body to metabolize sugar, we would expect someone who consumes a lot of sugar to have a lot of or at least an above avg level of unmetabolized sugar in the body; and yet, the stimulus tells us that the opposite is true (ppl who consume a lot of sugar have lower levels of unmetabolized sugar). Moreover, this answer choice doesn't address what happens in real time when you consume sugar (the level of unmetabolized sugar increases). It only addresses what eventually happens i.e. down the road.

Does that make sense?

0
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Wednesday, Dec 27 2023

Law school isn't going anywhere, so unless you have a personal reason why you absolutely need to attend law school as soon as possible, I'd suggest you take your time, retake, and get a solid score.

6
User Avatar

Thursday, Apr 06 2023

marcdelgado01942

Resume Jobs

Hello everyone,

I plan to apply to law school this fall but at the moment I'm going through a difficult time at work. The job isn't very glamorous, I'm an Operations Assistant at a Real Estate brokerage, but it pays the bills and is giving me networking opportunities as well as a Letter of Recommendation. With that said however, I've decided to quit this job because there's just too many problems and it's time to move on. However, I'm a little concerned when to quit because law schools dissect every part of your resume if you're a nontraditional law school applicant.

I reach the 2yr threshold in July and I'm more than capable of putting up with these problems til then. However, if I don't have to, I'll give them my 2 weeks and quit sooner.

So my question is: do law schools place a bigger emphasis on the number of years (an even 2yrs) that you've worked at a place or does it just not matter after you've crossed 1yr or 1.5yrs?

Maybe I'm overthinking this but I'm concerned that working less than 2yrs at this job will seem suspect and will weaken my application.

Please participate in the poll and/or let me know your thoughts.

Thank you

1
PrepTests ·
PT111.S3.Q26
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Saturday, May 14 2022

There's a significant jump in the logic that I feel that answer B fails to address. The conclusion addresses assessing a discipline's scientific value based on its shady origin. What does that mean? Presumably, it means that a discipline is not taken serious or considered a true science if it had weird origins. So how does the fact that alchemy is different than modern chemistry help us determine whether chemistry is a serious or true science? It doesn't.

#help (Added by Admin)

5
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Saturday, May 07 2022

Law school isn't going anywhere: do well in college, get a high GPA, find what you want to pursue as a career, have a great college experience. After you graduate, get some experience in the legal field and then start studying for the LSAT. Whether it takes you a year or three years after college, you'll be better equipped with a high GPA, experience, and hopefully a high LSAT score.

2
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Saturday, Oct 09 2021

175 on the LSAT and get admitted to the University of Notre Dame and the University of Wisconsin!!!!!!!

1
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Wednesday, Aug 11 2021

@dimakyure869 said:

@tunamelt99396 HMU. I'm here for all my 7Saging superiors. @kimmelsara198 knows WHERE IT'S AT. @dimakyure869 ALL THE WAY BABYY

Thank you man, really appreciate it.

I have a couple of questions, but the first one is you mention that you reached 170s in a month, where were you before tutoring? Were you high or mid 160s? Or lower?

Also, how often did you meet with your tutor?

I haven't taken any PTs because I've been perfecting my method for RC, LG, and LR (doing nothing but problems and problem sets) but I feel like if I took a PT right now, I'd probably score in the low 160s.

So, if I hired a tutor, how often should I meet with him to start? Do they work on your method and then they leave you to work on that method until you hire them for another session or does a tutor supervise your development every step of the way?

I've got a lot more questions but I don't want to overwhelm you. Sorry if I did bro.

Thanks for sharing your experience

0
User Avatar
marcdelgado01942
Tuesday, Aug 10 2021

@dimakyure869 said:

@kwangleestuff519 I realized I glossed that question initially sorry fam. And my tutor mainly taught me how to cross off wrong answers. We do the whole stem-stim-AC process and practice skimming the AC's real quick in like 8-10 seconds and crossing off the bad ACs. I'm left with 2 AC's on the 1-4 star Q's usually. Then I just depend on straight up gut power. I compare them, click an AC, and move on as quick as possible. But I'm in a rut right now NGL. I went 174, 163, 168 the past two weeks. LSAT can smd.

Hey man, I'm saving up for a tutor right now, do you mind if I message you a couple of questions? I'm interested in your path to a 170 with a tutor.

Thanks

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?