I know how the curve is determined in advance. But that doesn't rule out the possibility that it could still have been determined in advance that the game was difficult and would, therefore, have adjusted the curve accordingly. Am I right?

Also, without breaking LSAC regulations, which two rules did most people misread?

Does anyone think that the difficulty of the game will affect the "curve" of the test in a favourable way?

Couldn't failing a requirement of a murder movie → not a murder movie? Requirement = necessary. Thoughts?

Doesn't answer choice C set up a bi-conditional between A and M?

Can D also be wrong because it limits the scope to "Great poems," which was just extra information in the stimulus?

B and C are BS answers. E Has the conditions reversed, D is subjective ("No good reason...") I get A by elimination. I think it's still a bit unclear how it is correct, but I take it and move on regardless.

Doesn't answer choice C force us to assume that the individuals in question were more accurate at first and less inaccurate later on in part because they simply began to forget more of the details of the crime, as would normally happen with memory? If we assume this, then they merely forgot more of the details of the crime by the time that the second guy got around to questioning them. As a result, they were more inaccurate because of this AND their stubbornness.

I thought this would be an unreasonable assumption to make on my first pass and so chose answer D. But went back during blind review and reconsidered it & I marked C as the answer.

Did anyone else think of this?

I don't think Boston College will have any money left at that point in the summer. They have been giving out very low offers to people who are qualified. For example, someone got in a Cornell with 90k/3years and Notre Dame with 120k/3years and only got 60k/3years at BC.

I'm confused why they are giving out such low offers this year. It's very strange...

Thanks Nilesh S!

What do other people think about study practices for a retake?

Yeah, I'm also planning campus visits at these schools before I do my re-write. Mostly so that they can put a face to my applications and I can get someone on the adcomm to advocate for me.

I'm already doing blind review as I did for my first LSAT. I just worry that re-doing PT's might be less beneficial, especially if I remember the answers instinctively...

Sorry if people below answered this already: There is another flaw in this question, in my belief. It equates "probability of avoiding heart disease" with "maintaining good health is increased"

It is a gap that I am not comfortable with.

How do you infer that AA --m--> FCA? The only indication is likely.

Couldn't we say that a necessary condition is failed: /know dictionary definition but still U (babies) mean we're not in "Bizarro" world?

Please comment here when you know for sure.

Try playing solitaire on a touch screen phone. That helped me during my free time on the bus/subway to get the speed down. Similar techniques behind both.

Thats a good explanation, thanks! I have the 7 sage ultimate package so I'm familiar with the argument type you are referring to with the jedi & force. What was confusing to me was the Powerscore & some other companies often group MSS and MBT together as "inference question" types. But this clear it up.

Thanks again.

Satisfying a sufficient assumption will guarantee that you go from crappy argument --> logical/good argument.

Failing necessary assumption will guarantee that you go from logical/good argument -->crappy argument.