Subscription pricing
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-16/
This question was, once again, a victim to bad habits. The habit in question was the "they're gonna trick me" habit. Guys, this is bullcrap. Don't choose less reasonable AC's because the one that is right seems ... too right?
What the hell is this. I can't even.
1
14 comments
We just did this in BR group last night. Not sure if I buy the implicit premise explanation.
WOOT! Will do.
@2543.hopkins I posted what I thought I said last night on the comments to this question, check it out and let me know if that's how I talked about it.
B and C are BS answers. E Has the conditions reversed, D is subjective ("No good reason...") I get A by elimination. I think it's still a bit unclear how it is correct, but I take it and move on regardless.
Also, I like your analysis, @tutordavidlevine115
AAAAAAAHHHHHH
Can't even believe they pulled this. So much to be learned from this question.
I agree that the writers had fun with this, not only with a colorful cast of characters, but also by:
-Using an implicit premise (Does not exist->belief is false) TWICE! Once in the stimulus and once in the correct answer
-Adding a killer trap answer (E) by paralleling word structure but not logical structure
-Forcing us to distinguish between not believing and a belief being false
Not sure what amount of time it would take me to get this one under timed conditions.
I don't know why but this reminded me of this video...
https://vine.co/v/ei5qdEijTAm
If you join us for BR group on Wednesday you will hear ALL about it :D
Hahah. I swear an LSAT writer was seriously baked when she/he wrote that LSAT question. "Unicorns and Centaurs...of course!"
What..is.. this ...?....
Why would I need to believe in something that I have in my garage?
SIR: you do not believe in unicorns, so you don't believe in centaurs, either.
Why isn't there a centaur version of the unicorn? Or maybe I mean a unicorn version of a centaur?