I didn't pick C because it says "we can NEVER be completely sure ..." rather than simply saying "we can NOT be completely sure ..." How do we get the support for "never?" How do we know because we cannot verify computer-dependent proofs NOW we cannot do it in the future? Thanks!

I was thinking maybe the 1st sentence is the premise for the 2nd sentence as well: "dictation software allows a computer to produce a written version of sentences that are spoken to it" supports "...dictation software has been promoted as a labor-saving invention." So A is correct. What is wrong with my thinking? Thanks!

I would also like to thank the 7Sage Team and especially JY! I became a member way back when JY would answer your questions on the pop-up chat window lol. Finally took my first LSAT in September and got a172!! It's a score beyond my imagination. Thank you so much! Congrats to you! I'm also super excited lol.

I'm still not sure how the argument depends on assuming a net increase in employment.

"Say that every person that is in one of these accidents, upon recovering, enters the workforce and is so efficient that s/he puts two people out of work. However, that efficiency demands a higher wage, so high in fact that s/he ends up making more than the other two people combined, and so, imagine, ends up paying more in taxes than the two now unemployed people.

So here we have a situation in which the argument is satisfied (we have an increase in GNP dependent on timely access to blah blah blah) without assuming D. What am I missing?"

Also, I think answer choice D is telling us that we need to assume these newly recovered people would be able to find a job. But why do they have to find a newly created job instead of replacing other people's jobs because they are more efficient?

Thanks and sorry for any confusion.

For Q25, what's wrong with (E)? The language such as "entirely different events" does seem to be a bit too strong. But isn't it true that those historians（who employed a nationalist approach）focused on the "glorification of the nation" whereas those early African American historians focused on reconstructing a African past? Thanks!

Is it appropriate for me to think that typically = usually = most and often = many = some? Or does "usually" and "often" simply means can be but doesn't have to be? Thanks!