I have a follow-up with the correct answer choice being B for question 1. I narrowed down my ACs to B or C, and ultimately went with C because I did not like the use of the word 'infer' in B. The construction of ancient techniques does not seem like an inference but a pretty concrete way of proving a hypothesis, and as we know the LSAC picks every word with intention so I thought they used 'infer' to trap us. Or is the re-construction an inference itself.

I understand how C is a summary of the main idea of para #3 as opposed to the whole thing but still feel it is strongly than the use of "infer" in B. I guess any advice on dealing with this for future questions or an explanation if anyone understands it better? Thank you : )

I strongly agree, LG is by far my best section and I never thought I'd actually enjoy doing them when I first started studying. More than missing LG I am really scared about only having '1 shot' at the LSAT. I wish they were removing it in December or during a less popular testing date so we could have at least had the August test for a second try.

I am also intimidated by what the LG section may look like since it's the last one, are they going to make it tougher because they know how many of us are counting on the LG section for our score?

*a hasty generalisation is the logical fallacy of making a claim based on a sample size far too small to support the claim