I think this is the first time I've found a stimulus truly incoherent.

I guess the tricky bit here is to notice that the scientists didn't assign one group to stretch and the other group not to, but that he just observed them naturally. I get why E is wrong, but I picked it because none of the other choices made sense to me. I thought they were talking broadly, not within these two apparently self-selected groups.

I got confused because even though in the past several decades the number of transistors doubled with the computing power, what’s to say that’s still happening after the 1990s? What if the power is doubling because of better quality metal or something?

It took me double the amount of recommended time but I got the most difficult question right! I'm taking the w I don't care.

Yeah, imagine like bravery is necessary for getting into Gryffindor but also a lack of intelligence is sufficent. So all the brave + smart kids get put into Ravenclaw, while all the brave + stupid kids get put into Gryffindor.

good to know it's not just my computer

I really don’t understand the difference between 1.2 and 1.4 :/

crazy that there isn't a video

I think it's the relationship between premise and conclusion that turns context into a premise. A premise is context in relation to a conclusion.

Isn't it an assumption that these rules have always been true? In the past, there was another way to get a genie+ pass without propitiation or prostration, and he still has a genie+ pass from that time.