I am interested

I am interested in joining.

Any chance we can do PT74 or 76 instead?

I am interested. Would like to Join. Count on me.

#help Can someone suggest some good resource within the core curriculum on embedded condition?

This is an amazing explanation by JY

JY in this video states that the type of flaw is a false dichotomy. He is correct. I wonder what literature he is using that provides such a diverse classification of flaws. False dichotomy is not mentioned in my PowerSchore and Khan Academy classes #help.

Did you have your transcripts submitted by Your foreign school or by some educational evaluation service?

Necessary assumption.

Bridge Type of Question.

Before reading the answer choices: I need to find a bridge that connects "understanding the purpose of the restrictions" and "policies that citizens do not create" .

This passage is about Russia, where "government officials are neither selected by free elections" and are not "open to criticism". In Russia the lives of citizens are controlled by policies they had no role in creating. Some people say that Russia is prone to civil disorder.

Why? Why can't Putin prevent or predict this civil disorder?

Because (D) when "People understand the purpose of restrictions" they must have participated in their formulation". It's the opposite of this in Russia.

One time it says: "The host has another meeting in progress" and when I open it in browser it says "The meeting has not started"

Now it says "The meeting has not started"

It says "The host has another meeting i progress"

Trying to connect to this meeting in Zoom. Keep getting 1001 error message

C) I chose C, but after carefully reviewing this choice I see what the problem is. I almost want to say that this AC does not pass the "fact test". It states: "takes for granted that certain effects can be produced independently". It definitely doesn't take this for granted.

I will join from 10AM (In Jackson WY)

How do we know that "not enough" is an indicator of of necessary condition (worthy of public trust)? I can not understand the conditional relationship between "varied experience" and "worthy of public trust". Can someone explain this? #help

If C if the right answer, then "many" can have the same meaning as "some". Right?

#help

lets just kick them in the balls and see

I would say that the threat is not the AI but the automation and computerization of legal profession. I work in the law office for more then two years and started noticing that many clients make patent filings themselves due to various software that enables you to do it without the help of an attorney. Many states, e.g. California have a very convenient systems of e-filing court documents with tons of templates for various motions. I filed my first civil claim without even going to law school recently. Corporate filings with states are done by clients and not attorneys anymore because they are so easy to do online now. I would say there is definitely a lot of clerical/secretary work being chipped off from legal practice, but it gets hard to predict what will happen to attorneys work. This whole thing actually worries me a lot. The best that can happen is decrease in the cost of legal services and volume of work the worst - replacement of legal profession by AI.

I made a mistake on the test and during blind review. This is why D seems correct to me: we are provided with a clue when the author says "internal coherence". If the music is as sophisticated as European music it must be independent of it's function and for something to be independent of it's function it should also be "internally coherent" (intelligible). D states that there is some sort of music that is unintelligible and sophisticated at the same time, however, we were told that it cannot be true. For this reason D is definitely incompatible.

#help I have a hard time understanding why A is the wrong

answer choice. JY's explanation is no help here.

It seems like A, B and C weaken the argument in some way. But in case B and C is correct, doctors may still be able to distinguish between effective and ineffective drugs. However, if A is correct, that's really bad, and doctors should not be allowed to prescribe such medication.

@ said:

Do you mean the writing sample portion of the LSAT? Or the personal statement?

I meant writing LSAT sample

Thank you David!

C is incorrect because it permits buying objects "already in existance at the time the species became indengered". Salvatore definitely doesn't agree with this. We may think that Roxane agrees with this, but we have no clue when elephants became extinct.