@onyskoandr483 said:

Do you mean the writing sample portion of the LSAT? Or the personal statement?

I meant writing LSAT sample

Thank you David!

#help Can someone suggest some good resource within the core curriculum on embedded condition?

This is an amazing explanation by JY

One time it says: "The host has another meeting in progress" and when I open it in browser it says "The meeting has not started"

Now it says "The meeting has not started"

It says "The host has another meeting i progress"

Trying to connect to this meeting in Zoom. Keep getting 1001 error message

I will join from 10AM (In Jackson WY)

If C if the right answer, then "many" can have the same meaning as "some". Right?

#help

I would say that the threat is not the AI but the automation and computerization of legal profession. I work in the law office for more then two years and started noticing that many clients make patent filings themselves due to various software that enables you to do it without the help of an attorney. Many states, e.g. California have a very convenient systems of e-filing court documents with tons of templates for various motions. I filed my first civil claim without even going to law school recently. Corporate filings with states are done by clients and not attorneys anymore because they are so easy to do online now. I would say there is definitely a lot of clerical/secretary work being chipped off from legal practice, but it gets hard to predict what will happen to attorneys work. This whole thing actually worries me a lot. The best that can happen is decrease in the cost of legal services and volume of work the worst - replacement of legal profession by AI.

This is a great explanation. Thank you very much.

#help I have a hard time understanding why A is the wrong

answer choice. JY's explanation is no help here.

C) I chose C, but after carefully reviewing this choice I see what the problem is. I almost want to say that this AC does not pass the "fact test". It states: "takes for granted that certain effects can be produced independently". It definitely doesn't take this for granted.

This is a bridging NA question. Negation strategy is sometimes not delivering the right result in this type of NA question. It's important to notice missing element immediately and look for it in the answer choices, rather than negate answer choices and test of they "wrack" the argument. The question is, honestly, quite strange I think it should be classified as NA.

It seems like A, B and C weaken the argument in some way. But in case B and C is correct, doctors may still be able to distinguish between effective and ineffective drugs. However, if A is correct, that's really bad, and doctors should not be allowed to prescribe such medication.

I am interested in joining.

Any chance we can do PT74 or 76 instead?

I am interested. Would like to Join. Count on me.

JY in this video states that the type of flaw is a false dichotomy. He is correct. I wonder what literature he is using that provides such a diverse classification of flaws. False dichotomy is not mentioned in my PowerSchore and Khan Academy classes #help.

jhbm - this is an amazing explanation for this question. The key in this question was to find out that A was a trap. To decipher E takes loads of time

Yes. D Is, indeed, weakening the conclusion. And because it's more generalized then E, it's seems like a correct answer. However, when we compare "many" (D) and "commonly" (E), we see how the later destroys causal connection.