Is it the case for anyone else that you understand how to work out these scenarios in English, but the Lawgic translation then makes it confusing to understand?

Have I lost my mind? Question 1 uses "never" as the operator, yet in my lesson on Group 4 words, it doesn't include the word "never"?

I fail to see how the possibility of the eye 'following a path', equates to temporal (time) order.

I'm convinced that the LSAT is as much a test of ability to read test writers' minds as much as it is anything else.

Pffft. Full stop.