LMFAO what a way to say 7Sage is poor quality. Also, I did pay for another platform tnx

Does it make sense to break it down this way??? I'm trying to understand the logic and am not sure if I broke this down accurately:

DOMAIN: [sentient beings on planets outside our solar system] + [anytime in the near future] + [at least as intelligent as humans]

CONC: How can we determine? We can determine by:

/send ships - communicate

/communicate - send ships

Therefore, we can determine that, if we cannot send ships, they need to communicate.

Or,

Therefore, we can determine that, if they cannot communicate, we need to send ships.

A - seems like a massive assumption that it is just us on Earth - NOPE

B - “would want to” - paragraph did not mention the “wanting” - NOPE

C - did not mention communication - NOPE

D - /Communicate - send ships - OKAY

E - did not mention ships - NOPE

I fell deep into the trap of not identifying the conclusion and subconclusion. Glad there was an example for this type of question.

His job is to provide explanations, not to say “who cares.” The narrator should be providing explanations for A-E, as many learners might select a wrong option & not understand why they chose it (or the thinking behind it).

Relax and stop trolling the comments section.

Not working for me either. I cleared my cache and logged out and in again multiple times. Still get these error messages

Please stop saying, "Who cares." This is an LSAT course. We want to know why wrong answers are wrong.

I 100% agree. It is so convoluted and long. I am tempted to just read the description or Google the explanations, as this is getting to be a pattern with these explanations.

Would the answer still be wrong if C said: "Most well-designed coffeehouses feature artwork," versus what is said above, "Most coffeehouses that are well-designed feature artwork" ??