- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Please stop saying, "Who cares." This is an LSAT course. We want to know why wrong answers are wrong.
Would the answer still be wrong if C said: "Most well-designed coffeehouses feature artwork," versus what is said above, "Most coffeehouses that are well-designed feature artwork" ??
Does it make sense to break it down this way??? I'm trying to understand the logic and am not sure if I broke this down accurately:
DOMAIN: [sentient beings on planets outside our solar system] + [anytime in the near future] + [at least as intelligent as humans]
CONC: How can we determine? We can determine by:
/send ships - communicate
/communicate - send ships
Therefore, we can determine that, if we cannot send ships, they need to communicate.
Or,
Therefore, we can determine that, if they cannot communicate, we need to send ships.
A - seems like a massive assumption that it is just us on Earth - NOPE
B - “would want to” - paragraph did not mention the “wanting” - NOPE
C - did not mention communication - NOPE
D - /Communicate - send ships - OKAY
E - did not mention ships - NOPE
I fell deep into the trap of not identifying the conclusion and subconclusion. Glad there was an example for this type of question.
Not working for me either. I cleared my cache and logged out and in again multiple times. Still get these error messages