Thank you for this!!! I was also thinking it could be super helpful to have some more data in question analytics, about how quickly/within how many seconds we eliminate a choice. I tend to eliminate the wrong answer choice sometimes, but cannot always remember if it was due to actual logical reasoning, or because I misread the choice in someway. Thank you!!!

I felt the same way!! I misidentified the conclusion and got it wrong for this reason.

The question stem says "respectively"

Hi! Could you please send over the full guide? Thanks!!!

@SierraSilversmith414 Wow, thank you so much for writing this all out I really appreciate! These are great tips especially the second one, and I think that would be super helpful for being able to make good decisions quick. As for the first tip, I try very hard to prephrase but when it comes to weaken, strengthen, flaw questions I usually never know in which direction to prephrase, besides the obvious alternate explanation. When it gets to the 4-5 difficulty questions from this family, I feel very lost among the answer choices and cannot really visualize the effect each choice has on the argument, do you think there is something I can do to fix this? Thank you again!

i was wondering if you have ever been stuck in the high 160s, and if there was anything in particular that helped you break out into the 170s! Thanks!

The passage also mentions that the " Third Period ... better undergirded organization among African American farmers and workers". That helped point me in the direction of B

@ScienceAlex Why do you suggest picking D specifically, is that like a known trick?

I am having trouble seeing why E is wrong. The stimulus fulfills the unless part of the answer, which would then lead us to the conclusion that it is generally not more important for a medicine than it is for a nonmedical product to be tested. I thought that matched the conclusion, and introduced the relativity feature that the stimulus had.

@VincentLaGuardiaG. How true and likely is this to be the case?

Can you better explain why AC A is bad. I assumed that these countries needed to have good sources of water, in order for these treaties and regulations to be drafted up in the first place. I treated this question like a Necessary Assumption question in a way.

@joeschmoe23 So on weekdays you did 1-2 sections a day? Or 3-4 a day?

The way I interpreted D, was that the original organ was modified to become more modern, so the architects were actually sticking to the goal of returning the church to its original form.