Subscription pricing
While accessing the materials the site crashed and displays a 404 Error. I know this had previously happened a few months ago. I'm not sure what happened and what I should do to expedite the fix.
PT Questions
rlq209769
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
rlq209769
Friday, Jan 10 2025
Also, worthy here means more negative news was to be reported about the challenger than the incumbent. It does not mean literal worth to the viewer.
rlq209769
Friday, Jan 10 2025
50% of 24hours would mean 12hours and 50% of 1hour would would be 30 mins. 30% of 24 hours would be 7.2hours and 30% of 1 hour would be 18minutes. Regardless what the same amount of coverage is, it wouldn't matter. The argument talks about the percentage of Negative coverage, rather than the amount of coverage. Which is why, A is wrong because the argument does not presume that both candidates received the equal amount of coverage.
rlq209769
Tuesday, Dec 24 2024
I think (C) is right instead of (B) because the principal is drawing an analogy to justify his case and the analogy is about throwing raising as similar to being stuck in the traffic. Nowhere in the stimulus he mentioned, that being stuck in the traffic was inconvenient, that's something you Assumed if you chose answer choice (b). However, in (c), he does relate throwing raisins as being stuck in the traffic like it's something unavoidable and the child has to face it.
rlq209769
Friday, Sep 06 2024
Interested! Anyone in NYC?
rlq209769
Sunday, Sep 01 2024
The Charles Entertainment Cheese guy better have a comeback as to why Janine did not choose the Mouse!
rlq209769
Monday, Jul 29 2024
Same here. I was just studying a minute ago!
rlq209769
Tuesday, Jul 23 2024
One answer I found for A :
The problem with A is that the author never assumed anything about using two different pieces of colored paper. All he argued was that using paper allows consistency - take a piece of paper and use it in one context, then move that paper to another context and the color remains the same but the effect may change. It's the consistency of the color of a single piece of paper that matters (as opposed to using paint, which you obviously cannot them pick up and move to another spot). Texture raises a whole different argument, on that he did not make here
Try negating A - what if two different pieces of paper with the same color but different textures result in different effects in the same context? Does that hurt the argument that the author made, that using paper is better than using paint when trying to teach about color? Not at all - it's not relevant to the question of color. Paper can still be a better choice than paint for the reasons the author gave. Since A, negated, does not hurt the argument, it cannot be an assumption of the argument
Try that negation technique on Answer C now and see what happens! I think you'll find that it does some major damage to the conclusion that paper is a better choice than paint
rlq209769
Tuesday, Jul 23 2024
One answer I found for A :
_The problem with A is that the author never assumed anything about using two different pieces of colored paper. All he argued was that using paper allows consistency - take a piece of paper and use it in one context, then move that paper to another context and the color remains the same but the effect may change. It's the consistency of the color of a single piece of paper that matters (as opposed to using paint, which you obviously cannot them pick up and move to another spot). Texture raises a whole different argument, on that he did not make here.
Try negating A - what if two different pieces of paper with the same color but different textures result in different effects in the same context? Does that hurt the argument that the author made, that using paper is better than using paint when trying to teach about color? Not at all - it's not relevant to the question of color. Paper can still be a better choice than paint for the reasons the author gave. Since A, negated, does not hurt the argument, it cannot be an assumption of the argument.
Try that negation technique on Answer C now and see what happens! I think you'll find that it does some major damage to the conclusion that paper is a better choice than paint_
rlq209769
Thursday, Jul 18 2024
Hello, I keep turning them off on every videos but they keep coming back on each new videos!
rlq209769
Tuesday, Jul 09 2024
1. Switching the use of gasoline vehicles to electric vehicles.
2. Use of the actual mailing system in the U.S. Why use mail when we can have email notices and pay almost every bill online?
rlq209769
Wednesday, Jun 26 2024
I think the first explanation for answer C that the 40-60 age group and freshmen at university make the answer irrelevant is wrong. For the majority, indeed, ages 40-60 aren't usually freshmen students, but that does not mean it is necessarily always true. You can have someone at 40-60 attending university at a later stage of their lives and be considered freshmen during their 1st year at the university. #feedback
rlq209769
Saturday, Jun 08 2024
Do law schools prefer in-house students who attended undergraduate at their establishment?
rlq209769
Monday, Feb 19 2024
Q 8.4 says:
"Visualize the grammar and logic:
if [clause 1], then [clause 2]
[clause 1] → [clause 2]
Lawgic:
native → more-resilient
/more-resilient → /native"
If Lawgic represents the grammar and clauses, isn't it supposed to be
if [clause 1], then [clause 2]
[clause 2] → [clause 1] ? #Help
I'd say negatively impact the action or make it difficult.