While accessing the materials the site crashed and displays a 404 Error. I know this had previously happened a few months ago. I'm not sure what happened and what I should do to expedite the fix.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I think the first explanation for answer C that the 40-60 age group and freshmen at university make the answer irrelevant is wrong. For the majority, indeed, ages 40-60 aren't usually freshmen students, but that does not mean it is necessarily always true. You can have someone at 40-60 attending university at a later stage of their lives and be considered freshmen during their 1st year at the university. #feedback
One answer I found for A :
The problem with A is that the author never assumed anything about using two different pieces of colored paper. All he argued was that using paper allows consistency - take a piece of paper and use it in one context, then move that paper to another context and the color remains the same but the effect may change. It's the consistency of the color of a single piece of paper that matters (as opposed to using paint, which you obviously cannot them pick up and move to another spot). Texture raises a whole different argument, on that he did not make here
Try negating A - what if two different pieces of paper with the same color but different textures result in different effects in the same context? Does that hurt the argument that the author made, that using paper is better than using paint when trying to teach about color? Not at all - it's not relevant to the question of color. Paper can still be a better choice than paint for the reasons the author gave. Since A, negated, does not hurt the argument, it cannot be an assumption of the argument
Try that negation technique on Answer C now and see what happens! I think you'll find that it does some major damage to the conclusion that paper is a better choice than paint
One answer I found for A :
_The problem with A is that the author never assumed anything about using two different pieces of colored paper. All he argued was that using paper allows consistency - take a piece of paper and use it in one context, then move that paper to another context and the color remains the same but the effect may change. It's the consistency of the color of a single piece of paper that matters (as opposed to using paint, which you obviously cannot them pick up and move to another spot). Texture raises a whole different argument, on that he did not make here.
Try negating A - what if two different pieces of paper with the same color but different textures result in different effects in the same context? Does that hurt the argument that the author made, that using paper is better than using paint when trying to teach about color? Not at all - it's not relevant to the question of color. Paper can still be a better choice than paint for the reasons the author gave. Since A, negated, does not hurt the argument, it cannot be an assumption of the argument.
Try that negation technique on Answer C now and see what happens! I think you'll find that it does some major damage to the conclusion that paper is a better choice than paint_
Q 8.4 says:
"Visualize the grammar and logic:
if [clause 1], then [clause 2]
[clause 1] → [clause 2]
Lawgic:
native → more-resilient
/more-resilient → /native"
If Lawgic represents the grammar and clauses, isn't it supposed to be
if [clause 1], then [clause 2]
[clause 2] → [clause 1] ? #Help
Hello, I keep turning them off on every videos but they keep coming back on each new videos!
1. Switching the use of gasoline vehicles to electric vehicles.
2. Use of the actual mailing system in the U.S. Why use mail when we can have email notices and pay almost every bill online?
Do law schools prefer in-house students who attended undergraduate at their establishment?
Interested! Anyone in NYC?
The Charles Entertainment Cheese guy better have a comeback as to why Janine did not choose the Mouse!
Same here. I was just studying a minute ago!