In the second usage of "which" (referring to a clause (subject and predicate)), why is the word "which" swapped out with the word "that"? I know the explanation mentions "we can swap "which" out with "that" and expand the sentence in two for clarity.", but is this just for clarity purposes? Why not use "this" instead of "that"? Am I thinking too much into it? Is it only to show that we can expand the sentences in two, or is it a specific rule?
Thanks!
3
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
In the second usage of "which" (referring to a clause (subject and predicate)), why is the word "which" swapped out with the word "that"? I know the explanation mentions "we can swap "which" out with "that" and expand the sentence in two for clarity.", but is this just for clarity purposes? Why not use "this" instead of "that"? Am I thinking too much into it? Is it only to show that we can expand the sentences in two, or is it a specific rule?
Thanks!