- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Thanks all for responding! I agree in principal but in practice it will be hard to stay away from new material. However, I think I will. Also, kind of mirrors the discipline it takes to stay on process during the test -- do what you know is right and trust that it will work.
I was planning on taking PT 74 on Friday, but I changed my mind after reading your post. Thank you for taking the time. I think you're absolutely right that my skill level is pretty much set for Monday and I am currently in maintenance mode. However, would you advise against chopping PT 74 up for some drilling this week in order to stay fresh? Also, would it be advisable to use PT 74 for the warm up on Monday?
Just to follow up on this, inference: must be true is an LR question type. However, here I was thinking that the "inference most reasonably supported" question stem might suggest a lower threshold of certainty. Can anyone further explain? Does "most reasonably inferred" require validity in the same sense as the LR "properly inferred" (MBT) q stem?
I think that this question, like many RC questions, requires you to see the relation of the material to the whole structure of the passage and in particular to the main point. Also, and I'm not 100% certain on this, but I see sufficient proof for an inference question as closer to MSS rather than MBT. If you push back the beginning of the third paragraph to the second paragraph and the MP, you can see how the Spanish poets lack of radical/experimental use and lack of curiosity about their language are good examples of their purported desire to maintain an ideal culture where the Spanish language is being used for traditional Spanish poetry and not for avant-garde or haikus.
Nicole - just bought my 35minutes watch. Thanks for referral.
As someone trying to push past the mid 160's scoring for good, your vision of what a 170+ scorer is like, and the difference between the two, is really helpful. Thanks Jon!
Very cool -- My answers below
↓
↓
↓
↓
1) a 2) e 3) c 4) c 5) b
Dgelf321 - here are my four combos. What would be the fifth?
ceanfbd
ceadnfb
dcaenfb
ceanfdb
Taking 10-12 preptests in April and hoping to increase my avg. about three points over the preptests I took in March.
I am a legal assistant and my proofing skills have greatly improved. I find that I no longer skip over filler words in sentences and I reread a lot more.
I got this question wrong by failing to follow my intuition. If I had been more diligent I would not have been so enticed by answer choice A whose predicate does not match the conclusion's predicate. In fact, as JY says the conclusion contains nothing about 'general thought'. I also made a mistake by not circling this, and missing the chance to blind review. I must know what I don't know!
When is the next blind review? Do you have a schedule?