- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I am having trouble diagramming the second sentence! Why is it "reduce fossil fuels --> a country to impose industrial standards"? I am not following the formal logic with diagramming this sentence, to me this sentence is particularly hard to parse out. Please help, much appreciated!
@coreyjanson479.janson35 Thanks for your reply! So for /S --> N or M, even though the or is jointly necessary for /S, we can have just N in or M in? What does jointly necessary refer to in this case because I interpreted it as N AND M have to be both in. Thanks again!
For example:
if N or M is selected, S is out.
Since or is in the sufficient condition, N and M are INDEPENDENTLY sufficient for S. So does that mean we can have just N selected, just M selected or both selected?
Also another example:
If S is out, N or M is selected.
Since or is in the necessary condition, N and M and JOINTLY necessary for S. What does that mean? Does that mean we need N and M BOTH to be selected? We can't have just N or just M selected? I'm so confused about this concept when applying to logic games... Please help, thanks!
But how would we know for answer choice E, the increase in everyone's incomes is an EQUAL amount? That is an assumption that we are making. We can also assume that the increase can happen for everyone, but with different amounts. Please reply to this asap thanks!
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X can go before Z as long as Y goes after Z. I am having trouble with my fundamentals, please help, thanks!
If the format for premise is A -> B
and conclusion is A -> C
then aren't the only conclusions we can draw is B some C or B most C? I think I'm confused with linking my conditional chains, can someone help?
Can someone help me diagram the stimulus and find the sufficient assumption?
What I have is:
P: art criticism most /satisfy
----
C: art criticism most /greatest works of art
SA answer: /satisfy most or some /greatest works of art
I was wondering, I thought we can't make contrapositives for most statements but the answer E does? Let me know if I am understanding this incorrectly, thanks!
Thanks guys! Much appreciated, I will postpone the exam until I feel ready, thanks again for the input :)
Hi everyone,
I just wanted some input from the group. I have been studying for months now and I am still not improving nor reaching my PT goal. Should I take my June test for the experience even though I'm sure I'll end up with a low score or just delay it to October? I've been delaying my LSAT several times so I feel like rather than pushing it behind yet again, taking it at least once now would be better. But by reading other forums lots of people say if one is not Pt-tng around their goal, then delay it. I'm aiming for a Canadian law school so many law schools just look at the highest LSAT score. Not sure it they will take into consideration of my other LSAT scores, for example I get a 141 on the June LSAT but for the October one I get a 167. Would love some feedback, thank you!
The answer choice sounds more like a sufficient answer choice though no?