interested!

@zacharytsmith26826 @thissunset62175 @samekman86 @lydiahuang10570 @soniaarora244 @danielandrewfernandes605 @akatsinis102 @elias7291405

Thank you all so much for your comments. I can't express how appreciative I am of all your comments. I was feeling so very low when I wrote that yesterday and each and every one of your messages helped me feel much better (3(/p)

I'm going to re-evaluate how I am studying because I have a feeling if I give up now I will always regret not pushing myself. I've always put the practice of law on a pedestal and admired lawyers. Giving up now means I'll always feel a sense of emptiness because I 1000% want to practice law and no other career (for me) can compare. The LSAT is designed to weed people out for law school and what I realized and helped me feel better is that this is just another barrier I have to get through. It is an extremely tough barrier but I also worked all throughout undergrad and finished which served as a barrier to get me to this point. This is the finish line to get into law school. I'm already familiar with the test and concepts, I just have to get better. It helps having all of your reassurance that some of you started off with very low scores and managed to improve or that some of you are in the same boat as me.

Thank you for not discouraging me as I truly felt someone should just tell me to give up. It's better I don't give up now than go into a career I don't like and realize 10 years later that right now would've been the perfect time to grind it out.

I'm having trouble with answer choice D.

Deceitful is a necessary condition. So, job properly --> deceitful

Answer choice D is: deceitful politicians --> ineffective

It makes some sense because I can see that it is a sufficient condition here but it just doesn't click for me as to why it's wrong.

#help

Why are the following Strengthen question stems:

o Which one of the following principles, if accepted, would most strongly support ABC against XYZ?

o Which one of the following principles, if established, would provide the strongest support for XYZ?

AND these are Pseudo Sufficient Assumption question stems:

o Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the ethicists reasoning?

o Which of the following, if added as a premise to the argument, most helps to justify it’s conclusion?

oWhich one of the following principles most helps to justify the XYZ?

What's the difference between the two stems? I know what each question stem wants be to do but I'm having trouble IDENTIFYING it on PT's #help

very helpful! thank you

#help

I didn't go through the entire course, he mentions for answer choice C "you can use the Group 3 without negate... translation method"

1. What is he referring to? Do you know where I can find this type of info of negating certain words in answer choices in the course?

2. Why is answer choice A wrong? Why is it flipped around and read that way?

@philosopherstonez340 that's a very interesting point. thanks for that comment :)

That's true. Good point.

Thanks for your help :smiley:

It's a bit of both.. I have the answers memorized but I force myself to see how I got the answer. When going through the inferences, I have them memorized but I need to force myself to remember how I got those inferences.

I find it difficult because I'm trying to increase speed while going the inferences/questions which I know the answers to.

Thanks everyone!!