I got confused because I mistakenly rode off the first sentence as "context" and not as a possible premise for the sentence that followed. Any thoughts/advice on that? Can context serve as both context and a premise? After reviewing the video, I thought it made more sense esp given that I missed the words "indicates that.." which I should've known is a conclusion and had to be supported by another claim (1st sentence.)
I got confused because I mistakenly rode off the first sentence as "context" and not as a possible premise for the sentence that followed. Any thoughts/advice on that? Can context serve as both context and a premise? After reviewing the video, I thought it made more sense esp given that I missed the words "indicates that.." which I should've known is a conclusion and had to be supported by another claim (1st sentence.)